DigitalOcean and SAP S4HANA on AWS are prominent cloud solutions. In pricing and ease of use, DigitalOcean often comes out ahead, while SAP S4HANA on AWS leads in features and scalability.
Features: DigitalOcean offers a user-friendly interface, reliable Linux-based cloud servers, and Kubernetes integration, supporting developers with its streamlined services. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides a robust HANA database, advanced in-memory processing capabilities, and comprehensive ERP solutions, facilitating detailed analytics and business insights for large enterprises.
Room for Improvement: DigitalOcean could enhance its feature set and scalability options to cater more to complex enterprise needs. Additional advanced automation tools would be beneficial. The documentation could be more extensive for deeper service understanding. SAP S4HANA on AWS may streamline its deployment process to reduce complexity. Enhancing real-time processing features and expanding integrations could also accelerate adoption. The product’s cost and resource requirements sometimes necessitate more efficient license models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DigitalOcean excels in providing a fast, straightforward deployment process paired with responsive customer service, catering well to smaller teams. SAP S4HANA on AWS, although more complex, benefits from AWS’s extensive support framework, crucial for managing comprehensive ERP deployments.
Pricing and ROI: DigitalOcean's pricing structure is straightforward and cost-effective, appealing to startups and developers looking for predictable expenses. In contrast, SAP S4HANA on AWS involves a substantial initial investment but offers significant ROI through its expansive and scalable ERP capabilities, suitable for enterprises pursuing long-term strategic value.
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.
DigitalOcean support is rated lower than AWS's because we encounter issues more frequently.
We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
I have not tried vertical scaling yet, but from the documentation, it seems very easy to scale the system.
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
For scalability and the ability to expand, I would also rate it an eight.
DigitalOcean is quite stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
It is approximately 50 to 60% stable, reaching 60 to 70% depending on usage levels.
As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.
I would rate the stability of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten.
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments.
The lack of a proper service provider model ultimately led us to cease operations with DigitalOcean.
There are issues where even with 8 GB RAM, the performance doesn't meet expectations.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
For smaller data, SAP S4HANA on AWS works, but it is not as efficient for mid-tier companies where the employee count exceeds five hundred or six hundred.
Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
DigitalOcean offers affordable pricing, especially for startups.
The main issue is the pricing, which is typically too high for small companies.
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
Some customers had compliance issues with Microsoft that did not exist in DigitalOcean, which provided more flexibility to use the solution.
The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.
The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well.
From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.
In terms of usage and automation, SAP S4HANA on AWS is very good at automation, where instead of manually punching entry by entry as with Tally, Zoho, or NetSuite, you can do a bulk upload and close it from one GL to another GL entry from one T-code to another T-code.
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SAP S4HANA on AWS | 2.3% |
| DigitalOcean | 1.9% |
| Other | 95.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
