Netwrix Endpoint Protector Reviews

Name: Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Brand: Netwrix
Rating: 4.2 (27 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

27 reviews
96% willing to recommend

190 followers

What is Netwrix Endpoint Protector?

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Get the Netwrix Endpoint Protector Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and more!

Netwrix Endpoint Protector is the #8 ranked solution in top Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions. PeerSpot users give Netwrix Endpoint Protector an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Netwrix Endpoint Protector is most commonly compared to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform: Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. Netwrix Endpoint Protector is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 52% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

April 2025

Get the report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Featured Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

Mohammad Amir Hossain

Head of IT Infrastructure at Samsung

There is an important feature that needs to be added. In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled. If there is a feature that can notify in the master dashboard that an agent has been uninstalled, it would be very beneficial.

Read full review

SunnyKumar

Senior IT Engineer at Instawork

I've encountered some latency issues that appear to be related to the internet speed. When I install the agent on the laptop, the internet speed often drops from 100 MBPS to around 80 MBPS or even as low as 50 MBPS at times. The slow response seems to be connected to the fact that all network traffic is routed through this agent. The challenge arises when trying to analyze the logs, as every single click and action, even a single command in GitHub, generates a multitude of logs. This makes it difficult to extract relevant information. It would be helpful to implement filtering mechanisms so that we can sort and view the data based on software and vendor, providing more clarity and ease in analysis.

Read full review

it_user1549800

Information Technology Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Endpoint Protector provides a single platform to support Windows, macOS, and Linux devices. There is some improvement that is needed there. The policies must be created per OS and in a large deployment with the diverse OS platform use case which can get a little bit unwieldy. Room for improvement there could be a way to clone a policy and map the old policy to the new policy on a new OS. Right now, you would just have to open it up on two different screens and map it manually, but a way to clone it to a new OS and map the differences or map the similarities would be room for improvement. I would rate the role-based access features for administrators a six out of ten. There's work to be done on the granularity of roles that can be assigned to an administrator but there is role-based administrator access present. That's why it's not a zero rating. We would probably make better use of tier1 support texts and give them granular abilities within the user interface to help us administer it and then move it to a different tier 2 tech support if the role-based permissions were more granular. A feature request would be treating a deny list as an exit point. We'd also like to have the ability to tie an allow list to a group rather than a policy so that the allow list follows the group of users or computers. Whatever policy they hit they're always allowed certain URLs. That would be a nice feature for management purposes. It could also use some minor UI improvements. There's a little bit of inconsistency in the UI that takes some getting used to.

Read full review

Netwrix Endpoint Protector mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category stands at 2.5%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

PeerResearch reports based on Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	May 11, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	May 11, 2025	Download
Comparison	Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	May 11, 2025	Download
Comparison	Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	May 11, 2025	Download
Comparison	Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention	May 11, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	4.2	6.4%	98%	63 interviews Add to research
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	3.9	15.8%	92%	22 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Netwrix Endpoint Protector's most valuable features are Device Control, Content-Aware Protection, Enforced Encryption, and role-based access. It effectively prevents data leakage via USB, blocks unauthorized device access, and controls data transfer to external applications. The platform offers cross-platform support for Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for hybrid environments. Granular policy creation, intuitive dashboards, and robust encryption further enhance its capability to safeguard sensitive information across diverse IT infrastructures.

"I rate technical support as ten out of ten."
"Netwrix Endpoint Protector works on Linux and macOS to block USB ports, control internet access, and manage other peripheral ports."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution is the device control, which manages any portable device connected to the endpoint, and content-aware protection, which controls data in motion from the endpoint to outside, like when users try to upload data to a web browser or an instant messaging application."

Room for Improvement

Netwrix Endpoint Protector requires improvements in policy customization, usability, and integration with networks and SaaS platforms. Users experience issues with blocking unintended sites or commands, slow internet speeds, and complicated installations across different OS platforms. Managing policies individually for each operating system is cumbersome. The policy engine lacks granularity, especially for Mac environments. Users request better alert features, improved role-based access, and a mechanism for auto-updating clients. Enhancements in predefined classifiers for data identifiers are also needed.

"When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time."
"In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled."
"Currently, for additional applications that need monitoring by the EPP, a request must be made to their technical support. It would be beneficial to add a feature allowing users to manually add applications for monitoring without depending on the vendor."

ROI

Users find significant value in Netwrix Endpoint Protector. It ensures compliance and security while providing visibility and control over media access. Managing permissions through OTP reduces IT workload. Despite difficulties quantifying ROI, users recognize its necessity and utility. They appreciate its role in preventing data breaches and protecting reputation. It's considered worth the investment, offering return in compliance, effectiveness, time savings, and client satisfaction.

Pricing

Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers competitive and budget-friendly pricing, appealing to organizations of varying sizes. While some users experienced initial price increases or changes in licensing models, many found subsequent renewal offers reasonable, especially for long-term commitments. Licensing starts with a minimum of 50 to 150 users, which some suggest could be more flexible. Despite some higher costs, its pricing is often deemed fair and competitive, offering a solid data loss prevention solution in the market.

"The product has average pricing."
"The pricing is reasonable for this particular market."
"The software comes with a higher price tag when compared to other DLP solutions."

Popular Use Cases

Netwrix Endpoint Protector is used to prevent data loss and unauthorized data transfers by blocking and monitoring USB ports and external devices. It secures confidential information across devices, enabling compliance in various industries. The system supports DLP, allowing organizations to control data flow, monitor user activities, and enforce security policies in diverse environments, including cloud and on-premises setups. It is significant in environments with compliance requirements like HIPAA or SOC 2, ensuring endpoint protection.

Service and Support

Netwrix Endpoint Protector's support is praised for responsiveness across platforms like Windows, Mac, and Linux. Many users commend quick email and call replies, but some experience delays and miscommunication. While some find support exceptional, others face challenges with time zones and follow-through. The quality of assistance includes setting up remote sessions and analyzing issues efficiently. Despite some areas for improvement, users often find support helpful and valuable.

Deployment

Users found Netwrix Endpoint Protector's initial setup easy and straightforward. Many described it as quick, taking from minutes to a couple of hours. Deployment strategies varied, with some organizations using appliance-based setups or MDM software, while configurations were occasionally ongoing. Support was noted as sometimes lacking, but guidance from documentation and prior planning helped in smooth implementation. Initial setup was often part of a broader deployment plan, accommodating both on-premises and remote users.

Scalability

Netwrix Endpoint Protector is noted for its strong scalability, handling a wide range of user numbers and device endpoints efficiently. Users indicate ease in acquiring additional licenses and managing deployment, even across multiple regions with various device counts. There are some concerns with policy management and feature parity across different operating systems. Generally considered resource-light and manageable without extensive manpower, users appreciate its ability to grow with their needs without significant limitations.

Stability

Netwrix Endpoint Protector is widely acknowledged for being stable, reliable, and requiring minimal maintenance. Many users rate it highly, noting no downtime or significant issues. Any initial challenges were resolved quickly through direct support from CoSoSys. The software performs effectively across various environments. While some faced initial hardware or agent-related concerns, these were addressed efficiently. Users praise its reliability, giving ratings often ranging from eight to ten out of ten for stability.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Netwrix Endpoint Protector Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Government

Comms Service Provider

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

Media Company

Retailer

Non Profit

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Legal Firm

Transportation Company

Hospitality Company

Security Firm

Non Tech Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Consumer Goods Company

Logistics Company

Leisure / Travel Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

International Affairs Institute

Mining And Metals Company

Compare Netwrix Endpoint Protector with alternative products

Learn more about Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Netwrix Endpoint Protector was previously known as CoSoSys Endpoint Protector.