Windows Server AppFabric vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Microsoft and Zenoss are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Zenoss is ranked #33. Microsoft holds a 0.6% mindshare in AIS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Windows Server AppFabric

Read 4 Windows Server AppFabric reviews

176 Views
95 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

48 Views
35 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Windows Server AppFabric

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and Windows Server AppFabric are competing in the IT infrastructure management space, each offering distinct advantages. Zenoss Cloud demonstrates strengths in monitoring and analytics, while Windows Server AppFabric excels with integration and scalability features, potentially making it the more justified investment for businesses prioritizing these areas.

Features: Zenoss Cloud is renowned for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time insights, and predictive analytics that enhance infrastructure management. It allows for integration with various cloud platforms like Azure and AWS, offering flexibility across different environments. Windows Server AppFabric provides seamless integration within Microsoft environments, supports distributed application management, and offers robust networking capabilities crucial for minimizing downtime in multi-server settings.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could benefit from enhancing its user interface to further simplify the system navigation for less experienced users and offering more customization options to cater to specific organizational needs. Expanding its documentation resources could also aid in improving user understanding and deployment. Windows Server AppFabric may focus on streamlining its installation process to reduce the technical expertise required for setup, enhancing its support for non-Microsoft environments, and updating features to be more adaptable to modern cloud-based infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers cloud-based deployment, providing ease of scalability and flexibility with robust customer service for troubleshooting. Windows Server AppFabric, requiring on-premises setup, appeals to organizations needing localized control, but may require more technical knowledge for successful implementation. The support for customizing deployment based on organizational needs stands out in both offerings, but Zenoss's cloud delivery simplifies management.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud often operates on a subscription model, offering predictable costs and favorable ROI through advanced monitoring features, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. Windows Server AppFabric typically involves upfront costs for on-premises infrastructure. However, its tight integration with Microsoft services and potential for enhanced ROI through operational efficiencies may justify the cost for businesses reliant on Microsoft ecosystems.

To learn more, read our detailed Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Windows Server AppFabric

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

33rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (14th), Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd), Container Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), AIOps (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Windows Server AppFabric is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

VIJAY RAGAVAN

Team Manager at Waters Corporation

Ensure seamless deployment and networking with a focus on critical uptime

The most important issue I've found is the blue screen errors, particularly when customers use external displays with a P-type cable. I have advised against using external displays for crucial applications and recommended using VGA or laptop adapter screens to mitigate this issue. However, the blue screen error remains a major concern because it causes data loss during reboots.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is AppFabric's hosting solution, which is what we need for running workflows."

"The ability to seamlessly deploy, image, and patch without causing downtime is extremely helpful and user-friendly."

"The product's deployment phase was very easy."

"It is very usable and easy to understand. Antivirus and VPN are the main features being used now. It allows my clients to access the network from home, which was very crucial because of the pandemic."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

Cons

"The product is unable to connect with different cloud services."

"Its price and licensing policy can be improved. It could be a little cheaper. Licensing is sometimes confusing. There are so many different options. It is difficult to find out what to buy or what to choose for my necessity."

"Microsoft will stop supporting the product next year, and we can't run unsupported programs in our systems."

"The most important issue I've found is the blue screen errors, particularly when customers use external displays with a P-type cable."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive, and its licensing is a bit confusing."

"The product is affordable, in my opinion."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Windows Server AppFabric?

The product's deployment phase was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server AppFabric?

The product is affordable, in my opinion.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Server AppFabric?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 38% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 35% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

March 2025

Download Windows Server AppFabric product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

April 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Windows Server AppFabric extends Windows Server to provide enhanced hosting, management, and caching capabilities for Web applications and middle-tier services. The AppFabric hosting features add service management extensions to Internet Information Services (IIS), Windows Process Activation Service (WAS), and the .NET Framework 4. This includes Hosting Services and Hosting Administration tools that make it easier to deploy, configure, and manage Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) based services. The AppFabric caching features add a distributed, in-memory object cache to Windows Server that makes it easier to scale out high-performance .NET applications, especially ASP.NET applications.

Microsoft

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

OSIsoft

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Windows Server AppFabric vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.