Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Teamtailor vs TribePad Applicant Tracking System comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Teamtailor
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Talent Acquisition (30th)
TribePad Applicant Tracking...
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
43rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software category, the mindshare of Teamtailor is 5.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TribePad Applicant Tracking System is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
 

Featured Reviews

CS
Allows us to connect with, take care of, and nurture possible employees
The video function could be improved. Now that we do a lot of digital interviews, you can actually have your own video function. Still, I would prefer if it were more of a team function where you could change the background, for example. With everyone currently working from home offices due to lockdowns, some of the backgrounds look quite unprofessional. It would be nice if we could have our own unique background — for branding purposes during interviews. When we schedule an interview, in the message function, you can create a placeholder using a name, etc. I would like to have more generic placeholders and for them to be included in the message function when you schedule the interview.
KM
Very intuitive, straightforward with a simple, easy to use interface
I was a little frustrated with the screening questionnaire set up. I felt that it could be better structured - we had thousands of questions, and this could make it difficult to find the right ones. It was very easy add a new question, but there was no way to organise or categorise the questions into groups by subject, level, country etc - so trying to monitor and maintain questions and questionnaires was a little bit tricky. At the time I also felt that the support materials could have been improved - Neither I nor the users that made up the global recruitment team had been there at the initial roll out, and so training and reference materials were invaluable. I would often create simple 'how to' videos but it would have been nice to have some more of the basics covered in the Tribepad material. Also some of the material was a little bit dated by the time I came to use it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's just an easy solution to connect with."
"The simplicity of use was absolutely incredible."
 

Cons

"The video function could be improved. It would be nice if we could have our own unique background — for branding purposes during interviews."
"The screening questionnaire was a little frustrating as there was no structure to the question bank."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a fixed amount that includes support. I think it's a very good deal actually."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software solutions are best for your needs.
858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
TribePad ATS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

iZettle, Tenant & Partners, Fyndiq, Spendrups, Fillipa K, Cybercom group
BBC, KFC, Pizza Hut
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartRecruiters, Greenhouse, Zoho and others in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software. Updated: June 2025.
858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.