OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #52 with an average rating of 6.0, while Broadcom is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,811 Views
1,612 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security

Read 145 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews

9,494 Views
8,070 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Symantec Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection are competitive products in the endpoint security management category. OpenText appears to have the upper hand due to its adaptability, lighter system impact, and superior customer support.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive range of protective features, including anti-virus, firewall, and intrusion prevention, with a single management console across multiple OS platforms. Its advanced threat protection capabilities provide robust security coverage. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is highlighted for its lightweight nature, cloud compatibility, and seamless operation, making it ideal for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users report high resource consumption, complex interfaces, and lengthy scan times. Improvement is needed in malware detection, especially zero-day threats, and a streamlined upgrade process. OpenText could enhance its malware detection and reporting capabilities, and its administrative functionality to match more comprehensive solutions like Symantec.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec offers flexible deployment options but faces challenges in cloud integration and perceived declining quality of technical support. OpenText's strong cloud compatibility and responsive customer service are frequently praised, making it a preferred choice for cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is seen as more expensive but offers a good return on investment by reducing downtime from security incidents. OpenText is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses seeking affordable yet efficient security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

52nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

145

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 3.7%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Symantec Endpoint Security	3.7%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	95.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Kumbesh Rajagopal

Senior Security Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Management becomes easier with minimal complications, but improvement in support tools needed

Regarding areas of improvement for Symantec Endpoint Security, there are many changes, and the support portal tool is complicated compared to other tools. When trying to get service from Symantec, the process is complex. I'm not sure whether it's because of my project or something else. Though it is easy to manage, easy to get, easy to install, and works efficiently for managing policies, we faced a significant disadvantage. We wanted to add multiple hashes because of numerous new alerts coming, but we could only add them one by one, which is a considerable disadvantage in Symantec.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"The Webroot cloud console is very powerful."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"It is a stable product."

"The solution detects malware very well."

"SEP, the entire suite of components, provides good endpoint protection."

"Device control is most valuable. Symantec is providing all such features in the basic plan, whereas when we last checked, such a feature was not available in the basic plan of Malwarebytes."

"Symantec has cloud-based endpoint protection, so whether a user is off the network or on the network, the endpoint will be protected by the cloud."

"The solution is easy to use."

"I like the additional features that come with it. The firewall feature and the encryption feature that they throw in are good as well. Another thing that I like about Symantec is that it runs on different platforms, not just on Windows."

"I find it is the most reliable solution on the market."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."

"We need more control over when upgrades to the app are rolled out."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."

"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Since the acquisition by Broadcom, we are no longer receiving the proper support."

"More control features can be added, and its performance can also be better. Sometimes, the performance is not good when we access the cloud console. Moving to each tab is slow. The dashboard can be a little bit user-friendly. For some users, it is a bit difficult. If someone is a little bit familiar with it, then it is fine. Otherwise, it is hard to find policies in Symantec."

"Users mostly complain that the solution slows down the system whenever something is scanned."

"The tool switches off automatically, and I have to restart it. Also, we had to manually fix some issues that cropped up while using the tool."

"Every time an OS comes out, I have to upgrade the Symantec product. They don't know how to patch it. If they would produce a patch instead of uninstalling or installing over the current version and rebooting I'd be a lot happier with the product."

"Automation of tasks should be improved on SEPM. It is currently manual, and we should be able to automate installation and deployment from the client side."

"We wanted to add multiple hashes because of numerous new alerts coming, but we could only add them one by one, which is a considerable disadvantage in Symantec."

"They provide the updates of the client, and those clients need a reboot after the upgrade, which is something we don't like. We don't like to reboot the server after the upgrade because we have live applications. If we do a reboot, it can impact the business as well."

More Symantec Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is based on a yearly subscription."

"One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint. The price is fair."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing."

"Its price is fair."

"What we have paid for this product is good value for the work and the services that they are providing to us."

"Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license."

"The licensing terms can range from subscription-based to perpetual, to annual, to tri-annual."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 19% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security

August 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module.

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.