Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #41 with an average rating of 6.8, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reviews
  • 1,864 Views
  • 1,659 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 144 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 10,537 Views
  • 8,956 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection are competitive products in the endpoint security management category. OpenText appears to have the upper hand due to its adaptability, lighter system impact, and superior customer support.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive range of protective features, including anti-virus, firewall, and intrusion prevention, with a single management console across multiple OS platforms. Its advanced threat protection capabilities provide robust security coverage. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is highlighted for its lightweight nature, cloud compatibility, and seamless operation, making it ideal for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users report high resource consumption, complex interfaces, and lengthy scan times. Improvement is needed in malware detection, especially zero-day threats, and a streamlined upgrade process. OpenText could enhance its malware detection and reporting capabilities, and its administrative functionality to match more comprehensive solutions like Symantec.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec offers flexible deployment options but faces challenges in cloud integration and perceived declining quality of technical support. OpenText's strong cloud compatibility and responsive customer service are frequently praised, making it a preferred choice for cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is seen as more expensive but offers a good return on investment by reducing downtime from security incidents. OpenText is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses seeking affordable yet efficient security solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
41st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
144
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 3.9%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers good UI and documentation
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
Read full review
MohammadAlshatreet - PeerSpot reviewer
Resolve support issues promptly while optimizing system resource usage
I use the solution primarily for scanning and identifying threats, which is essential in determining the percentage of resources used, such as CPU and hard disk. It's important to balance resource consumption to maintain operational efficiency. Furthermore, the incident response capabilities allow me to resolve authentication and support issues promptly, ensuring the system operates without downtime.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."
"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."
"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."
"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."
"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."
"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."
"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pros
"Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets."
"Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control."
"Their threat protection is very good. We are managing a good number of users thanks to the solution and we are pretty satisfied with it."
"It seems to be user-friendly. Our users seem to like it for the most part."
"Symantec is very user-friendly, the interface and functions are very simple for everyone to understand. Additionally, it's a very robust system."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"Its response time is the most valuable. It is very quick."
"There is no other endpoint solution that will help you in preventing lateral-movement attacks on Active Directory. And Active Directory is one of the more critical assets within an organization."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."
"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."
"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."
"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."
"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."
"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."
"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."
"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ cons
"The agent shouldn't use up so many resources at the endpoint when scanning and protecting."
"The Centralized Management could be improved."
"The virus definitions could be updated more frequently."
"SONAR could be improved. The false/positive rate is a little high."
"We must have complete dissolution with advance care protection but we are finding out that we need more Symantec technical specialists. We have identified a need to hire at least one more technical specialist familiar with Symantec to improve our solutions capabilities."
"The technical support could be a bit better."
"The technical support could improve because when you reach level one support there is a lot of delays."
"They need to develop a multi-language interface."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."
"It is relatively cheap."
"The solution is very cost-effective."
"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."
"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."
"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."
"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."
"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pricing and cost advice
"It is normal. If you are an educational institute, they give you a very good discount. If you are coming from the banking side, they may or may not give you a discount. I'm working with seven companies, and normally, they get a 65% to 70% discount on everything."
"Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license."
"It's not cheap."
"The pricing was one of the factors that led us to choose this product."
"Its price should be reasonable."
"Licensing is based on a yearly subscription."
"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."
"When it comes to pricing, Sophos is preferrable to Symantec."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Real Estate/Law Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
See all answers
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 22% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 16% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 11% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 11% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 9% of the time
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 19% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 11% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 7% of the time
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 5% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
June 2025
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reportDownload OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
June 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
  • AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
  • Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
  • Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
  • Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic
What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
  • Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
June 2025
Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.