We performed a comparison between Symantec Data Loss Prevention and WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."Users like the product because of its simplicity and the rate of detection."
"DLP's most valuable feature is compliance."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention are endpoint security, endpoint agent, and DLP. Additionally, we have been satisfied with the policies."
"The exfiltration capabilities are great. You can put all of these rules in the product to detect the patterns and text."
"We can integrate with some other tools such as Splunk, which is very useful."
"An excellent solution for data classification."
"The incident response capability has been instrumental in mitigating potential data loss."
"For detection, it has a great algorithm. It can recognize ID numbers and everything that you put in a policy for the end-users. That is really great for us as an institution where we have sensitive data. It recognizes all the sensitive data when someone tries to transfer it or put in other data."
"I find that their tech support is excellent. And as a reseller, my relationship with my point of contact is also strong. WatchGuard does a good job of maintaining that."
"One of the most valuable features is that when we send emails and it gives a warning, you can configure those email addresses so that they can only send outside the email."
"It is something that we need for compliance, and it has been useful. Their support staff is also amazing."
"In the object capture recognition, which we implemented recently, there are a lot of false positives that have been happening."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved."
"The database is a problem for us, as it's running on Oracle and not everybody likes that."
"I would like to see an improved interface, with better documentation and integration with other products."
"The one downside for Symantec is that, due to its transition from Symantec to Broadcom, there's been a lot of changes. I am based in the Philippines and we don't have a contact person locally for any Symantec."
"There should be more documentation with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. We had trouble with the first few deployments."
"We're not sure if there was an issue or a bug on the system recently because as of right now if someone sends out a compressed encrypted file, the DLP won't scan it."
"We need to have agent auto-parsing."
"They need to stop the VLAN limitation. They have a VLAN limitation on the size of their boxes. It is the worst thing ever. They basically sell their boxes by the size and the number of VLANs it can handle, which is a real issue. You spend a couple of thousand dollars for a firewall, and you can only do 30 VLANs, which is extremely silly, as a matter of fact. It would be really great to have something for easier mass rule changes. It also needs a drag-and-drop function so that you don't have to constantly duplicate firewall rules. It would be nice to have such a feature because you got one WatchGuard, and you want to mirror its config and change a couple of things in another one and move some things around. It is not as easy as you would necessarily think. It is kind of expensive, and its pricing can be a little better for sure."
"There is a problem with the RAM - it's eating up resources. The RAM utilization sometimes reaches up to 80% - 95%, and what we do is just restart the firewall."
"WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention catches so little. When I've implemented it, it just can't look at the traffic in a thorough enough manner to capture as much as it should. And I find that I'm disenchanted with all data loss protection solutions I've tested and looked at."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention is ranked 37th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention writes "Good support and easy to set up, but it catches very little". Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas WatchGuard Data Loss Prevention is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.