Sucuri vs Uplynk comparison

Sucuri Security and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Sucuri Security is ranked #36, while Uplynk is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. Sucuri Security holds a 1.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sucuri Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

2,483 Views
1,837 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 7 Uplynk reviews

4,499 Views
1,845 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Sucuri and Uplynk cater to different web solutions, with Sucuri focusing on web security and Uplynk on media streaming. Sucuri has the upper hand in website security capabilities, whereas Uplynk leads in media streaming services.

Features: Sucuri provides robust security features like DDoS protection, malware removal, and firewall integration. Uplynk excels with adaptive bitrate streaming, advanced content delivery, and smooth platform integration.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could enhance user experience by improving its interface and providing more real-time analytics. Uplynk may benefit from more competitive pricing and expanding its platform integrations. Both could improve their feature updates to meet changing technology trends.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk offers an efficient deployment process with comprehensive documentation and customer support concentrated on media integration. Sucuri emphasizes an uncomplicated setup process for its security services, focusing on ease of use. Uplynk's customer service slightly surpasses due to specialized media trend support.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri offers a budget-friendly security solution with a commendable ROI due to its extensive protection measures. Uplynk's higher setup costs are justified by its exceptional streaming services, offering good value and reliability, albeit at a higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed Sucuri vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri vs. Uplynk

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

36th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Domain Name System (DNS) Security (25th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (8th), CDN (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Sucuri is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Uplynk	1.3%
Sucuri	1.6%
Other	97.1%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Jagobandhu Some

Hardware Engineer at Ministry of Defense

A cost-effective choice for website security and informative support with issues related to CDN quality

One area where they could improve is in providing real-time support options because now you need to open a support ticket and wait for their response. It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance. I have found their Content Delivery Network service to be lacking in quality, and it could certainly be enhanced to provide better performance. I would also like to see improvements in the deployment process, as it currently takes more time than desirable. Another significant concern is that their service when your website is down, turns it into a static site. This means that if customers try to visit your site during downtime, they will see old content from the static site, which is not ideal. The CDN and tracking services are areas that need improvement, as well as addressing their bandwidth limitations.

Read full review

AliKhalil

manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable live streaming has increased our continuous viewership and maintained audience trust

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site. Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live. Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders. I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships. Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Rather than locate some things manually, the Sucuri plugin scans and allows us to pinpoint whether there is malware or some problem in the site."

"For people who own a personal website, this solution is worth trying out since their security solution is somewhat full-fledged."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership, as it does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership, leading to approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

Cons

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 13% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 10% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

July 2026

Download Sucuri product report

Buyer's Guide

Uplynk

July 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Sucuri offers comprehensive website security solutions with features like malware detection, notification plugins, and simplified risk management via collaboration with website providers.

Sucuri specializes in website protection by combining malware detection, IP monitoring, and domain scanning to identify threats such as phishing. Although it eases security workloads and streamlines setup, some users highlight areas for enhancement, including improved .NET support and real-time customer support options. Despite needing upgrades in certain aspects like PCI testing and DDoS protection, its strengths lie in securing WordPress sites and managing web application firewalls effectively.

What are Sucuri's Key Features?

Malware Detection: Identifies and alerts users of website infections efficiently.
IP Monitoring: Provides analytics and visualization for tracking IP requests.
Domain Scanning: Detects malware and phishing across domain names.
Collaboration with Providers: Works with website providers for risk mitigation.
Website Security Simplification: Streamlines security processes with minimum effort.

What Benefits or ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Security Workload: Automation minimizes the need for constant manual monitoring.
Enhanced Threat Identification: Proactive notifications help in swift risk management.
Streamlined Setup: Easy deployment reduces implementation time.
Trust in Risk Updates: Reliable backend notifications ensure timely threat awareness.

In specific industries, Sucuri is implemented to safeguard WordPress environments and manage traffic using web application firewalls. Organizations often utilize its IP blocking and geolocation features for enhanced website protection, benefiting from its malware cleanup capabilities in various sectors.

Sucuri Security

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri vs. Uplynk

August 2026

Free Report: Sucuri vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Sucuri vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sucuri vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.