SpecFlow vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Tricentis and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Tricentis holds a 1.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to UiPath’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

SpecFlow

Read 4 SpecFlow reviews

500 Views
265 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,792 Views
223 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SpecFlow

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SpecFlow and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,543 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SpecFlow

Ranking in Test Management Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Management Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of SpecFlow is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

KreshenAmourdon

Software Automation Test Engineer at I2era

An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users

In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."

"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."

"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SpecFlow is an open-source product."

"SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Healthcare Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SpecFlow?

One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?

SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SpecFlow?

In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow

Compared 69% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs SpecFlow

Compared 31% of the time

More SpecFlow Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 46% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow

June 2025

Download SpecFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

SpecFlow+

Test Suite

Overview

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Tricentis

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SpecFlow vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.