SolarWinds Incident Response vs xMatters comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SolarWinds and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. SolarWinds is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Everbridge is ranked #12. SolarWinds holds a 1.8% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

SolarWinds Incident Response

Read 11 SolarWinds Incident Response reviews

1,509 Views
1,494 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

3,532 Views
3,143 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Incident Response

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2026

xMatters and SolarWinds Incident Response compete in the incident management sector. xMatters has the upper hand in customization and flexibility, whereas SolarWinds is praised for its user-friendly reporting and cost-effectiveness.

Features: xMatters excels in workflow building, custom REST API integrations, and notification management. It is noted for its high flexibility and built-in integrations that streamline processes and incident management. Users can extensively customize notifications and designed workflows, which improves efficiency in managing incidents. SolarWinds Incident Response is recognized for its reliable alerts, vast integration options, and user-friendly reporting, making it a suitable choice for more straightforward incident management needs.

Room for Improvement: xMatters users call for better integration flexibility, enhanced reporting features, and improvements to API and license management. Some highlight a need for more intuitive dynamic list and template management. SolarWinds Incident Response may benefit from a more intuitive UI and stricter alert resolution controls. There are user-driven enhancement opportunities for both products to meet evolving needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: xMatters offers multiple deployment options, including private, public, and hybrid cloud configurations, with a commendable support team known for quick assistance and high responsiveness. SolarWinds also supports varied cloud setups and has a solid support framework, although xMatters is perceived to excel in customer engagement and response times.

Pricing and ROI: xMatters is characterized by a higher price due to its comprehensive features, which may yield substantial ROI through enhanced incident management efficiency despite its costly licensing model. In contrast, SolarWinds Incident Response is viewed as cost-effective with affordable user pricing, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget. The decision between these products should consider the balance of costs and organizational needs, with xMatters offering advanced features for a higher expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SolarWinds Incident Response

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of SolarWinds Incident Response is 1.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.4%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Incident Response	1.8%
xMatters	4.4%
Other	93.8%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

HemantKumar7

Senior Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Proactive alert routing has improved uptime and now reduces incident impact across teams

Squadcast requires improvement in that whenever team members upload notes, there is a restriction preventing them from manually resolving alerts. Alerts can only be resolved via proper signals from Alertmanager. Users should not be able to resolve incidents without manual intervention. This is a major requirement because team members sometimes resolve alerts manually, risking the resolution of critical alerts. Additionally, with multiple production environments and services, we receive multiple alerts for issues such as the same disk alert several times. To reduce this noise, we utilize suppression and need deduplication rules. Having a feature to set deduplication rules in one service applicable to other services would be a great help. Other improvements needed for Squadcast include observations I have made over the last four years, and I will convey any updates regarding improvements in the future.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Squadcast has positively impacted our organization by providing timely acknowledgment of alerts, which improves our handling of production issues."

"Squadcast has impacted our organization positively by reducing more time and by making sure our solution runs faster."

"Squadcast notifications have helped me resolve issues faster because they notify me as soon as an issue happens, and then I go and fix it before it gets escalated to further sections."

"Squadcast helped us build a better product by improving both response time and reliability."

"Squadcast has positively impacted my organization by helping with incident management and enabling alerts to be responded to more quickly."

"Squadcast has positively impacted the organization with its notification feature that allows receiving a call in case an alert is missed from the UI, enabling timely action, which helps in resolving issues within the minimum time frame and prevents more production issues."

"When we receive alerts in a timely manner, we can proactively monitor our systems without downtime, maintaining system health with proper alerts, and within the time frame, we can take the necessary action to resolve those alerts, helping to delay major incidents and achieving uptime above 99.9% and 99.2%."

"Squadcast has positively impacted my organization by significantly limiting production incidents compared to before; after using Squadcast, we are much more aware of particular incidents happening with the production server."

More SolarWinds Incident Response pros

"Through one tool, we're able to generate email notifications, voice notifications, mobile push notifications, Slack channel notifications, all managed from one place, simple and easy to use. People are able to join the conference bridge directly from the phone call by pressing one button instead of having to dial into a bridge and remember a conference code."

"This automation of incident notification processes has immensely affected our ability to respond to incidents."

"It has been a good journey over the last three years, getting more details about, and insights into, the product."

"The support is probably my favorite thing about xMatters."

"Having this automated has led to a significant improvement in incident resolution time (resolution can now occur quicker than the time to previously contact the correct person)."

"The integration possibilities that xMatters offers are very good, with a lot of integrations built within the applications that are just plug and play, which is massively beneficial for us."

"We use xMatters for alarming infrastructure outages and failures of batch jobs (post-processing)."

"That automation is the critical aspect of xMatters. Without those workflows, then we would have a system that maintains an on-call schedule in Excel. So xMatters provides the notification workflow and ensures you're notifying the right person at the right time."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"A few areas need improvement. For example, AI-generated incident summaries take a lot of time to be completed."

"Squadcast can be improved if we restrict the manual resolution of alerts, as currently this feature is lacking inside Squadcast."

"Squadcast could be improved if the pricing could be reduced per user."

"Squadcast could be improved because when multiple alerts trigger, the team currently performs manual resolution of those alerts."

"Squadcast requires improvement in that whenever team members upload notes, there is a restriction preventing them from manually resolving alerts."

"In terms of improvements for Squadcast, there are opportunities, such as having only two workflows for tagging alerts based on priority P1, P2, with our current premium plan."

"I remember when we were working on the integration, the documentation was not great, and we found it difficult to understand what the document was saying in some parts."

"One feature I think Squadcast must improve is the message quality and call quality we get; currently, the proper message is not being clearly heard on the calls we receive."

More SolarWinds Incident Response cons

"When you are not using the conference bridge from xMatters and you are using an external one, it is a little bit hard to get the person whom xMatters calls to jump directly to the external bridge. They need to hang up the phone and then get to the email to get the URL so that they can jump on the bridge. There is no direct connection from xMatters to that external bridge, but I understand that part of the business."

"It has not improved our organization."

"If you want to alter a custom field, you can do so via import/export. But you can't have an unlimited number of custom fields, so in a large environment with a lot of teams, team provisioning becomes more difficult."

"From a scheduling standpoint, this is actually causing more work than what we had with Excel spreadsheets."

"Some of the workflow development work that we do for the in-house piece can be quite complicated if you don't have experience using the tool."

"Integrations seem to be the most difficult part. Once setup though, they work well."

"I've asked for the ability to have tags on groups, and for dynamic lists, meaning the ability to pull data from another location and use it in xMatters dynamically. Right now, for example, if I have a form and want to populate a list, it's a manual process. I have to copy and paste the list items."

"We would like to see the ability to support custom devices. We have a lot of users who use Slack, which is another tool for communication. xMatters currently does not support Slack as a communication method. It can't send events to Slack and respond to them."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing. Our customer has only purchased a set number of full licensed users, and we are constantly running up against our license limit. To mitigate licensing concerns, we completely control at the admin level user additions and removals, and do a monthly cleanup process driven by security contractor removal reports."

"The only potential concern is professional services. They are capable, but like to bill on an hourly basis."

"I'm not really involved with the cost standpoint. I've only heard rumors of how much it costs, and if it costs what I think it costs, its cost is very high as compared to a lot of other tools that we're using here. It seems on the higher end from a cost standpoint."

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"Pricing is pretty straightforward and listed on their website. I recommend starting small and expanding later."

"The cost depends very much on the company's size and usage. We're a very high use case compared to many companies, so we had to consider licensing costs carefully. If we added all our users, that would be 30,000, and that's no good; we wouldn't have been able to afford it. For example, we had to put in customization to sync across on-call users. For the license per user, the price is very reasonable and comparable to ServiceNow when factoring in everything that needs to get up and running."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Squadcast?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very awesome because pricing is affordable. They charge a very affordable pricing compared to features. The setup cost was more attractive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Squadcast?

A few areas need improvement. For example, AI-generated incident summaries take a lot of time to be completed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Squadcast?

My main use case for Squadcast is in two different ways. I use it for on-call management, whereby I'm able to schedule calls and do the escalations, as well as live call routing to agents. That is ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BigPanda vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 24% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 14% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 10% of the time

FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Incident Response Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 24% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 14% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 14% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 7% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response

October 2026

Download SolarWinds Incident Response product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

October 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

No data available

xMatters IT Management

Overview

Squadcast enhances incident management by providing centralized notifications and alert escalation. Its integration capabilities and user-friendly design improve response times, impacting MTTR and MTTA positively. Organizations use Squadcast to streamline incident responses and maintain system thresholds efficiently.

Squadcast is an effective platform for incident management, offering features like multiple notifications via phone, email, and SMS for quick alert responses. Escalation policies and maintenance window suppression help reduce alert noise. Its integration capabilities with Prometheus and AWS improve service management, ensuring alerts are timely acknowledged and routed to the appropriate teams. Users find Squadcast's interface support for incident management and reporting beneficial. Suggestions for improvement include simplifying the interface, enhancing alert handling, and clarifying documentation.

What are the standout features of Squadcast?

Notifications: Receive alerts via phone, email, and SMS for fast response.
Escalation Policies: Customize how alerts escalate for efficient handling.
Integration: Seamless integration with Prometheus, AWS, and other tools.
Routing: Direct alerts to relevant teams with tagging for focused responses.
Maintenance Window: Suppress alerts during maintenance to reduce noise.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Response Times: Faster alert acknowledgment impacts MTTR positively.
Team Efficiency: Enhances incident routing and management.
Service Management: Integrations with monitoring tools streamline operations.
Alert Reduction: Maintenance suppression lowers alert noise.

In the tech sector, organizations rely on Squadcast for monitoring and threshold breaches. Integrating with Prometheus and Alertmanager, it serves as a central alert system. Notifications trigger via various channels to ensure rapid incident response. This setup helps tech teams maintain performance metrics effectively.

SolarWinds

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

September 2026

Free Report: SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SolarWinds Incident Response vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.