Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs ThreatMon comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SOCRadar Extended Threat In...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (10th), Digital Risk Protection (5th)
ThreatMon
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatMon is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence1.9%
ThreatMon1.4%
Other96.7%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pedro Ladeiro - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cyber Security Expert at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Centralized threat intelligence has protected vip accounts and detects dark web exposure quickly
Pricing is a problem as I see it. The credit-based model is extremely expensive. If a company does not have at least €70,000 to invest, they tend to avoid the solution because of the cost structure. The issue is not necessarily the pricing itself, but rather the credit-based model. If the pricing were structured as a flat fee of €70,000 or €30,000 with unlimited searches and unlimited credits, I would see much greater value in the solution. However, with the current model, you pay tens of thousands of euros and still have limitations on your searches. For an MSSP like myself, this is particularly challenging because we have dozens of customers. If we conduct a search for every customer monthly, bi-monthly, or even quarterly, the credits will be depleted by the end of the year or even sooner. The credits can become expendable very quickly, sometimes within a few months. This is the only downside of SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I believe it is almost the perfect tool for CTI. I consider it the leading CTI tool on the market. There are many others that try to get close to it, but they are not even close.
reviewer2544048 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
AI-powered discovery enhances threat visibility while customer support excels
I am a reseller. One of our customers suffered an attack a few months ago, and they discovered that they have some data available on the deep and dark web. The biggest driver for using ThreatMon was takedown services. SIEM integration into their incident response was also essential. They wanted…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature that SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence offers is definitely the detection of leaks in the dark web."
"The most complete solution of all, which goes across everything and the entire spectrum, is SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence."
"Machine learning or AI discovery, which discovers our resources on the deep and dark web, has been very useful."
"I would recommend ThreatMon."
 

Cons

"SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence does not handle growth well as my needs change."
"Pricing is a problem as I see it. The credit-based model is extremely expensive."
"We are looking at a better pricing model to onboard as many customers as possible."
"ThreatMon is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
Pricing is a problem as I see it. The credit-based model is extremely expensive. If a company does not have at least €70,000 to invest, they tend to avoid the solution because of the cost structure...
What is your primary use case for SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
I use SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence for VIP monitoring, CM tool monitoring, and CTI, specifically for early detection systems for our customers. If there is any leakage of customer accounts...
What advice do you have for others considering SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence?
I am not using their AI tool. I do not know if they have any AI currently. I did not check it, but every company nowadays has some AI platform or AI integration because it is a new niche. I basical...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatMon?
ThreatMon is very expensive. We are looking at a better pricing model to onboard as many customers as possible.
What needs improvement with ThreatMon?
We are looking at a better pricing model to onboard as many customers as possible. Additionally, we are trying to figure out certification training. Training and pricing could be improved.
What is your primary use case for ThreatMon?
I am a reseller. One of our customers suffered an attack a few months ago, and they discovered that they have some data available on the deep and dark web. The biggest driver for using ThreatMon wa...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Qualys, TrendAI and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: March 2026.
884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.