Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs SnapLogic comparison

"The Logic App's designer is one of the vital features"

"The product integration with Active Directory and detailed execution tracking for debugging are the most valuable features."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."

"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."

"Its notable advantage is its user-friendly UI, which allows easy testing."

"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"Overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"

"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features."

"The scalability could be improved."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."

"The product should integrate more APIs"

"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."

"The pricing could be improved."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is good for certain types of workloads, but it doesn't offer many customization options."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option."

"The support is the most important improvement they could make."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"We'd like there to be more ways for users to get more comfortable and have more experience with the solution to make it easier to use."

"The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services."

"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."

"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."

"The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."

"The pricing is not expensive."

"Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

"I used the free trial."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."