Slack vs Yammer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Slack Logo
2,578 views|1,112 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,827 views|987 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Slack and Yammer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Slack vs. Yammer Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use Slack for general communication, conference calls, and sharing screens because we have people working from different countries.""It offers customization options for various applications, including integrations with Zoom for video calls and a wide range of other integration plugins.""The portal is at its best version now.""The most valuable feature is that we can easily integrate different workloads and the alerts are reliable. Also because it allows us to use it as a monitoring tool sometimes.""Slack is a collaboration tool where you can create specific topic-related channels and manage different threads on different talks so people can interact and maintain a chat.""The solution makes it easy to create groups, share documents, and communicate.""The most valuable feature is the screen sharing, which works well.""With respect to being a clean and efficient communications platform, I think that it does the job quite well."

More Slack Pros →

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.""We can send out notifications and ask questions using Yammer.""I find it quite simple and intuitive. It's similar to using a more user-friendly interface for SharePoint. It integrates seamlessly with the browser, so you hardly notice you're using it.""The most valuable feature of Yammer is its interface.""The solution was stable.""It's really easy to use the solution.""The posting features are valuable.""The integration with Teams is the biggest value for us. In fact, it has only become more valuable now that it has integration with Teams. Teams allows you to stream, so that's good."

More Yammer Pros →

Cons
"The mobile app needs improvement. It consistently misses notifications.""There could be a read function so that when you send a message, instead of the other person having to add a reaction, you know that the message went through.""Customization is something that Slack is lacking.""It could be more stable than one of its competitors.""I want a feature in the solution that will help me share documents only with the set of people that I prefer rather than all of them. I would also like the solution to have a feature similar to Microsoft SharePoint where you can group all your documents.""I have found it cumbersome to create and set up groups, or channels.""For me, the only thing I can say is that every time somebody sent me an attachment, the attachment was listed somewhere, and then I had to open the conversation and go to the individual to open it. So there is no handy repository or an easy way to quickly look at attachments. For me, that was a bit difficult.""Slack should add a feature to schedule meetings."

More Slack Cons →

"The solution's feature for sharing could be better.""Yammer has very limited features.""Although Microsoft is working on it, having a centralized network instead of creating multiple networks based on a domain would help businesses with multiple companies or child companies.""Users need to be in the Acting Directory to exploit the features.""The product seems to just add to the complexity of using existing tools.""Yammer should include more integrations.""I faced some issues with Yammer's mobile app when I shifted from Android to iPhone, and it got a little bit tricky to use it on an iPhone, which took away some of my time.""If you are using other applications that are tough to integrate into the environment, that can cause limitations."

More Yammer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We use the free version that does not have a license."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "It is less expensive than one of its competitors."
  • "It is an expensive tool. We pay 15 to 20 USD monthly per user."
  • "Slack is definitely worth the money."
  • "The pricing can range up to about twenty bucks a user. You can spend a lot of money, especially if you're talking about thousands of users. Generally speaking, Slack is less expensive than Teams. Slack doesn't include all the bells and whistles that Teams does. So you can go from a $6 license in Microsoft 365 to a $50 license per user per month, and there's a lot more you can do in the $50 license."
  • "I would rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "The solution is cheap in my country."
  • More Slack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't know about the pricing. Now that Microsoft has bought Yammer, it should be a part of our subscriptions for Office 365."
  • "The pricing is not bad."
  • "Its cost is included in the license bundle for Microsoft."
  • "Yammer is a pretty cheap solution, and it's included in multiple subscriptions."
  • "Compared to other products like Amazon, Yammer's pricing is fine."
  • "We get it as part of our Office 365 subscriptions, so I don't think we pay any additional cost for Yammer. It's included in the Office 365 subscriptions."
  • "I think that there is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution."
  • More Yammer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    There are several discussions on SharePoint’s social strategy going on at the moment. I had some great discussions with my MVP mate Adis during Summit last week. Since #SPC12 almost every SharePoint addicted developer, it-pro, power user has reviewed Yammer. If you don’t know what Yammer is, here a short introduction. Yammer is an enterprise social network, which allows you and your coworkers to communicate in a modern way as on Facebook. The huge difference between Facebook and Yammer is, Yammer is private. That means only people from your organization or the people you’ve invited to join your network can see and take part of the conversation which is going on in your Yammer network. With the common understanding of Yammer, you should be able to follow up the ongoing discussions. Adis wrote a great post, summarizing his thoughts on SharePoint and Yammer integration and the upcoming social future. I totally agree with Adis, there are a lot of things missing at the moment. But here my thoughts on Yammer vs. SPSocial Leak of integration In my eyes there is still too much missing, of course you can integrate yammer into your SharePoint, but key features are missing such as SSO, seamless look ‘n feel integration. Prebuild views on Yammer depending on the current SharePoint context or the mobile story. Microsoft shipped mobile Apps for SharePoint 2013 OnDemand and OnPrem. AFAIK are these apps currently available in preview, but each of them is based on SPSocial. SharePoint… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Nowadays, we don't need to visit an HR portal. Our marketing and human resources teams directly share details about birthdays, upcoming events, and important dates in Slack. Whether it's a training… more »
    Top Answer:We could see improvement in Slack by having an integrated meeting tool. Currently, we rely on third-party integration tools like Zoom to schedule meetings. It would be much more convenient to schedule… more »
    Top Answer:We can send out notifications and ask questions using Yammer.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, we lose access to the solution for unknown reasons.
    Top Answer:We can create channels in Yammer and attach them to a particular team in Microsoft Teams. Anyone can join the channels, get notifications, and collaborate. We can send out notifications and ask… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,578
    Comparisons
    1,112
    Reviews
    34
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    1,827
    Comparisons
    987
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    SharePoint logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Symphony logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Atlassian Confluence logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Chatter logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    ChatWork logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Workplace by Facebook logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    SAP Jam logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Chatter logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Jive logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Interact Intranet logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Slack is where work happens. It’s a digital workspace that powers your organization — all the pieces and the people — so you can get things done.

    Slack brings all your communication together in one place. It's real-time messaging, archiving and search for modern teams.

    Yammer is an enterprise social network that allows employees,managers, executives, teams and different office branches to engage,collaborate and innovate over one interactive virtual network.

    Yammer creates a social workplace that drives innovationthrough the sharing of ideas and business intelligence, boosts productivity inteams and projects, and encourages communication and connectivity betweenemployees, no matter where they are located.

    Sample Customers
    Strava, The New York Times, Spotify, Blue Bottle Coffee Company, Eventbrite, Box, Circa, Stripe
    Verizon, Rakuten,Nationwide, DHL, Westfield, Telefonica, 7-Eleven, Red Robin, Intuit, eBay,Darden, Suncorp, Tyco, Xerox, and ModCloth.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Marketing Services Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization82%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Financial Services Firm3%
    University1%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Insurance Company13%
    Non Tech Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise83%
    Large Enterprise12%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Slack vs. Yammer
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Slack vs. Yammer and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Slack is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Social Software with 68 reviews while Yammer is ranked 4th in Enterprise Social Software with 60 reviews. Slack is rated 8.4, while Yammer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Slack writes "A competitive solution that improves collaboration and productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Yammer writes "Ease of use and a familiar user interface". Slack is most compared with SharePoint, Symphony, Atlassian Confluence, Chatter and ChatWork, whereas Yammer is most compared with Workplace by Facebook, SAP Jam, Chatter, Jive and Interact Intranet. See our Slack vs. Yammer report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.