We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"Tenable Nessus has a good performance, is very user-friendly, and is easy to use."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"I like its ease of use. It has the script that is pre-built in it, and you just got to know which ones you're looking for."
"Once you get past the initial implementation, the solution is very stable."
"Nessus is good at finding out what nodes you have in place. It will then provide you a report, by node, of what the vulnerabilities are. It does it quickly and stealthfully."
"Easy to set up vulnerability scanner with good stability and a responsive technical support team."
"It is a mature tool."
"Tenable Nessus streamlines the process of scanning for our organization."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"We use credentialed scans. They need more permissions and more changes or settings on Windows and Linux."
"I would like to see more on the automation side."
"I would like to have a management option after the network scanning."
"Tenable Nessus could improve reporting and information sharing. It would be helpful if we could share the reports and have a little bit better flexibility in the reporting of the data."
"The solution should be able to support more devices."
"EQA's and dashboards should be addressed in the next release."
"Multiple steps to create an actionable plan will be a great addition to Nessus."
"Vulnerability recommendations are outdated and not in line with industry standards."
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Rapid7 InsightVM and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Pentera.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.