Secureworks Taegis XDR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Secureworks and Trellix are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Secureworks is ranked #22 with an average rating of 6.0, while Trellix is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6. Secureworks holds a 0.8% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Trellix’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution.

Secureworks Taegis XDR

Read 2 Secureworks Taegis XDR reviews

112 Views
92 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 39 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

525 Views
342 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Secureworks Taegis XDR

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Trellix Network Detection and Response and Secureworks Taegis XDR compete in cybersecurity, focusing on threat detection and response. Secureworks Taegis XDR generally has an advantage due to its extensive features, integration, and automation.

Features: Trellix Network Detection and Response offers accurate threat detection, seamless integration with existing systems, and cost-effectiveness. Secureworks Taegis XDR provides strong integration capabilities, enhanced automation, and sophisticated threat mitigation tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Secureworks Taegis XDR supports flexible deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating quick integration into infrastructures. Trellix Network Detection and Response offers straightforward deployment and comprehensive support for faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Network Detection and Response is known for lower initial setup costs and favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious companies. Secureworks Taegis XDR has a higher setup cost but provides enhanced security features and long-term value, making it attractive for businesses prioritizing superior protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Secureworks Taegis XDR

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

22nd

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (35th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Secureworks Taegis XDR is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

Balakrishna Mysore

Senior Manager, Services at International Turnkey Systems - ITS

It's a complete solution package

When I go into the portal, I can see how many endpoints are enrolled or how many of them are active in place. I can see the current number of threats that are there in the organization. How many threats have been identified, etc. I can see which endpoint the critical events are coming in from a security aspect.

Read full review

BiswabhanuPanda

Senior technical consultant at Hitachi Systems Micro Clinic

Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one

The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a complete solution package."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."

"Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."

"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."

"The server appliance is good."

"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."

"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the network security module."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"We found limitations in the XDR's detections, lacking the ability to create customized detection and log parsing rules."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We'd like the potential for better scaling."

"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."

"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."

"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."

"The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response."

"The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless."

"Technical packaging could be improved."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit pricey."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."

"The pricing is a little high."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Secureworks Taegis XDR?

It's a complete solution package.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Secureworks Taegis XDR?

Initially, we found limitations in the XDR's detections, lacking the ability to create customized detection and log parsing rules. This functionality, available in the Cortex XDR platform, wasn't p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Secureworks Taegis XDR?

More from the perspective of SOC to ensure that every endpoint is taken care of from a cybersecurity perspective. It's a complete solution package.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

While I do not handle pricing directly, it is known that there is a variety of customers with different licensing needs, which depends on the organization's size and policy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response. Networking often involves complexity that c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Secureworks Taegis XDR

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Secureworks Taegis XDR

Compared 21% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Secureworks Taegis XDR

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Secureworks Taegis XDR

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Secureworks Taegis XDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Secureworks Taegis XDR Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 15% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

March 2025

Download Secureworks Taegis XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

April 2025

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

Secureworks Taegis NDR

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

Secureworks Taegis XDR offers cutting-edge extended detection and response capabilities to enhance cybersecurity efforts. It effectively integrates and analyzes comprehensive data to provide actionable insights for threat identification and mitigation.

Secureworks Taegis XDR consolidates security data, thus enabling organizations to detect and respond to threats more efficiently. Its integrated approach allows for seamless correlation across data sources, enhancing the ability to identify threats quickly and accurately. Best suited for enterprises seeking comprehensive threat detection and response, it helps in simplifying and strengthening security operations by broadening the coverage and context of threats.

What are the key features of Secureworks Taegis XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes sophisticated algorithms to identify threats in real-time.
Automated Response: Enables instant mitigation actions to minimize potential impact.
Data Integration: Provides seamless data aggregation from multiple sources.
Continuous Monitoring: Ensures round-the-clock vigilance through persistent monitoring capabilities.
Scalability: Easily adapts to the growing security needs of an organization.

What benefits should users expect from Secureworks Taegis XDR?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens overall security defenses through proactive threat identification.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated threat responses.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage and reduces incident response costs.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a centralized view of security events across platforms.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, Secureworks Taegis XDR is implemented to address sector-specific cybersecurity challenges. Its tailored solutions cater to the dynamic and sensitive nature of data protection in these fields, ensuring compliance while providing robust threat defense mechanisms.

Secureworks

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

April 2025

Free Report: Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.