SAS Data Integration Server vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared SAS and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. SAS is ranked #40 in DI , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 0.8% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #10 in RPA , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

SAS Data Integration Server

Read 4 SAS Data Integration Server reviews

1,338 Views
1,030 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,845 Views
1,707 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SAS Data Integration Server

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS Data Integration Server and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Data Integration Server

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (40th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

SAS Data Integration Server and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAS Data Integration Server is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 2.0% mindshare, up 1.7% since last year.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAS Data Integration Server	0.8%
SSIS	3.6%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)	3.6%
Other	92.0%

Data Integration

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tungsten RPA	2.0%
UiPath Platform	12.5%
Microsoft Power Automate	10.3%
Other	75.2%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2937544

Works at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offloads processes on the server side but needs better installation syntax

One area for improvement is the installation process. Another point could be the syntax, as it sometimes involves using syntax names that are not intuitive. For example, to calculate the difference between two dates, the general syntax in SAS is called the data difference or data net function. However, another name is used, such as NF and INK. Without knowledge of SAS programming, it becomes unclear what these functions mean. It is not good to define function names this way.

Read full review

Mahmoud Alyabroudi

Solutions Architect at DEWA

A n automation solution with OCR and scanner

Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release. Firstly, The first level of support needs enhancement. When you open a ticket with Tungsten, they inquire about various aspects of the issue. The initial support level should involve conducting a Webex meeting to address and assess the reported issues within the environment directly. This would involve thoroughly checking the issues and logs, among other relevant factors. It may require a minor configuration adjustment that could be resolved promptly during the session. There are several challenges associated with Tungsten RPA. Firstly, there is often a perception issue among employees who may believe that RPA is intended to replace their jobs rather than enhance efficiency. This misconception can hinder the adoption of RPA solutions in the workplace, as employees may resist the implementation of automation technologies. Secondly, there have been challenges related to integrating Tungsten RPA with applications built on Java. Many issues have been addressed and resolved in V11.3, thus improving the compatibility of Tungsten RPA with Java-based applications and major challenges.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."

"The solution is very stable."

"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."

"The solution is very stable."

"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"Kofax RPA has provided our organization with a lot of savings in many different areas and we have improvements in data quality."

"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."

"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."

"The scalability of Kofax is very handy, because with a few clicks you can have your scalable environment up and ready and it is not so complex to configure the entire environment."

"Initially, the most effective features for process automation were website automation related to web auditing, SharePoint implementations, and automated management of information."

"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."

"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."

"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."

"One area for improvement is the installation process."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"So I would like to see improved integration with other software."

"Something that could improve is writing SQL to integration studio because it is not that straightforward. There should be better integration with other software."

"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

"We're not really happy with the outcome of one particular complex process."

"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

"Exception handling needs to be improved."

"The product could be improved if they would use AI integrated robots."

"There have been a lot of issues we have had that have taken weeks, if not months to fix and the support is not satisfactory."

"The solution needs to be scalable."

"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive program."

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SAS Data Integration Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAS Data Integration Server?

I am involved in the ETR job. My role is focused on executing the ETR job.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAS Data Integration Server?

I use it without further details. For example, if I use SAS to connect to a NetEazt database or purchase a shared asset to ODBC, I can connect to any database with ODBC connection support. The over...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

I am not a user of Tungsten RPA; I sell this product for our company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kofax RPA?

Tungsten RPA reduces manual work, especially in financial services and HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 9% of the time

Stitch vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 4% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 4% of the time

dbt vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 4% of the time

More SAS Data Integration Server Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 32% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

WorkFusion vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download SAS Data Integration Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, Enterprise Data Integration Server

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

SAS Data Integration Server is a powerful, configurable and comprehensive solution that can meet a wide variety of data integration requirements, from small tactical projects to strategic business initiatives. It can access virtually all data sources, support data warehousing, migration, synchronization, federation and provisioning initiatives. It can support both batch-oriented and real-time master data management solutions. It can create reusable data integration services in support of service-oriented architectures and data governance and extract, cleanse, transform, conform, aggregate, load and manage data.

SAS

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Free Report: SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Data Integration Server vs. Tungsten RPA report.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.