SAP Process Orchestration vs Workato comparison

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 28 Workato reviews

2,728 Views
1,446 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and Workato based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, IBM, Informatica and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: January 2026).

Business-to-Business Middleware

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (7th)

Workato

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. SAP Process Orchestration is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 5.7%, down 8.9% compared to last year.
Workato, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 4.5% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Process Orchestration	5.7%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services	12.9%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	9.8%
Other	71.6%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Workato	4.5%
Boomi iPaaS	8.6%
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps	7.2%
Other	79.7%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Shubhra Shrivastava

API Integration Architect, Sr Manager at Beauty Tech Retail Domain

Intuitive automation streamlines workflows with room for more deployment options

The best features I appreciate about Workato are how intuitive it is, its low-code, no-code feature, and its true cloud-native environment where we don't need to worry about infrastructure settings and fine-tuning. Though I find the task-based usage in Workato challenging, requiring careful workflow design. The benefits from using Workato include automating workflows using the low-code approach, demonstrating while creating workflows, and making changes on the go. These capabilities enable faster delivery compared to our earlier work environments when using hybrid integration platform or MuleSoft. The delivery time has drastically improved using Workato because of its low-code feature and pre-built connectors which are very easy to use compared to MuleSoft. The ease of deployment is a distinct feature when compared to Tipco, MuleSoft, or any other integration tool. The delivery time is drastically reduced, allowing changes to be made immediately and demonstrated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."

"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

"Overall, I would rate SAP Process Orchestration a 10 out of 10."

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"It is easier to use than other technical open-source technologies."

"I definitely recommend Workato to others; it is the best product in our technology stack, allowing us to integrate legacy systems and address diverse requirements."

"Personally, I enjoy using Workato, and my company feels that it results in significant time savings since it is easy to understand and allows new team members to onboard quickly."

"Their UI interface is very strong compared to other tools, allowing even non-coders to perform basic data transfers between systems effectively."

"The delivery time has drastically improved using Workato because of its low-code feature and pre-built connectors which are very easy to use compared to MuleSoft."

"I absolutely think it is worth the money to have Workato as a tool."

"It serves as a one-stop shop where you can maximize coverage on both the automation and AI side."

"Their automation and workflows are very strong, and you can build the workflows very easily and quickly."

More Workato pros

Cons

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"The solution could be more scalable."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"From a technical standpoint, the security features at the data orchestration level could be more organized, and improvements in certificate management are necessary."

"I would like to see the dashboarding and reporting processes improved."

"The data flow and debugging processes need improvement, especially for tracing issues. Additionally, Workato struggles with scalability when handling high volumes of data, such as terabytes, requiring chunking for initial data loads."

"Workato could be improved by adding a proper debugging feature. Currently, there's no way to set breakpoints to stop the process and debug an error as you can in other tools like webMethods."

"I have observed some minor stability issues with Workato, particularly related to connectors failing occasionally and delays in report sending."

"The management dashboard in the solution is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."

"The data flow and debugging processes need improvement, especially for tracing issues."

"From the deployment point of view, our customers encounter platform downtime where it does not serve the actual request on the systems."

More Workato cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

"Speaking about price, I would say that it's market-related. Also, there are costs in addition to the standard license fees since different add-ons depend on what you require."

"Workato is an expensive solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, the pricing is around a six. We have a consumption model and the pricing is higher. If you are using any kind of ML-based approach, machine learning, or some advanced analytics, you may have to pay more."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

What needs improvement with Workato?

In Workato, there are some limitations regarding very high transactional data in file formats. For instance, we have a 90-minute job timeout, and queues larger than 10,000 size will be purged. Addi...

What is your primary use case for Workato?

The usual use cases for Workato include real-time data processing from either SFTP or SAS, and we have implemented multiple use cases for our clients in the past 3.5 years. For example, the employe...

What advice do you have for others considering Workato?

I have been working with clients for Workato implementation, focusing on consulting and implementing solutions for their business needs. We automate basic workflows and handle various complexities ...

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Workato

Compared 12% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Workato

Compared 9% of the time

UnifyApps vs Workato

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Workato

Compared 5% of the time

SnapLogic vs Workato

Compared 4% of the time

More Workato Competitors

Product Reports

SAP Process Orchestration

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Download Workato product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

No data available

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Named a Leader in iPaaS for Dynamic Integrations by Forrester, Workato is a modern automation and integration platform. With its enterprise-grade capabilities, you can seamlessly integrate and orchestrate workflow automation across cloud and on-premise applications, files and databases without coding.

The Workato team comes from a deep background in building integration products and will continue to expand and change the automation and integration space.

Start your 30-day free trial here.

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Panera Bread, Berkshire Hathaway, Salesforce, Box, Splunk, ComScore, IBM, Complex Media, Microsoft, Home Depot, Cisco, News Corp, Braille Institute

Business-to-Business Middleware