We performed a comparison between SAP Information Steward and Syniti Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Quality solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."
"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."
"The solution is very fast."
"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable."
"Setup is straightforward."
"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."
"The major benefits of Syniti Data Quality stem from the productivity and flexibility it offers to users."
"Syniti has built-in 80% of the solution, and we only need to customize 20 to 25% of the features. It is easy to run and pre-load reports."
"With Syniti Data Quality, you can integrate SAP and directly fix errors from Syniti Data Quality instead of logging into SAP and then fixing them."
"The customer service and support is good."
"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."
"Performance could be improved."
"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."
"The solution could improve by incorporating other applications, such as Power BI to show more visualization. More interaction with other solutions would be a good benefit."
"The support team is not very responsive."
"Needs to be more powerful on rules."
"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."
"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."
"It would be good if Syniti Data Quality could integrate more AI in the future."
"The customization of the data needs improvement. We need to build basic SQL queries rather than being able to do it within the tool. We need to be able to analyze the SQL queries and then rerun them based on customer usage."
"In Syniti Data Quality, data extraction is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The loading mechanisms and administration processes, particularly in setting up connections and deploying the system, need improvement."
SAP Information Steward is ranked 6th in Data Quality with 9 reviews while Syniti Data Quality is ranked 7th in Data Quality with 4 reviews. SAP Information Steward is rated 7.6, while Syniti Data Quality is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SAP Information Steward writes "Great for collecting, monitoring and planning storage capacity; functionality could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Syniti Data Quality writes "A highly stable solution that can be deployed very quickly and easily". SAP Information Steward is most compared with SAP Data Quality Management, SAP Data Services, Innovative Systems iLytics Enterprise Data Quality, SAP PowerDesigner and Syniti Information Management, whereas Syniti Data Quality is most compared with SAP Data Services and SAP Data Quality Management. See our SAP Information Steward vs. Syniti Data Quality report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
