Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

Sangfor and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while WatchGuard is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. Sangfor holds a 0.7% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,586 Views
1,570 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 35 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

4,776 Views
2,913 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Sangfor Endpoint Secure and WatchGuard EPDR are two prominent endpoint protection solutions. WatchGuard EPDR tends to be superior due to its comprehensive feature set and emphasis on automated responses.

Features: Users appreciate Sangfor Endpoint Secure for its robust threat detection, response capabilities, and competitive pricing. WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its advanced threat hunting, automated response features, and comprehensive customer service.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve its integration with other security tools, enhance reporting capabilities, and optimize resource usage. WatchGuard EPDR users recommend better performance in resource usage, more granular control over certain security policies, and improved integration with existing frameworks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sangfor Endpoint Secure is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. WatchGuard EPDR has positive feedback for ease of deployment and is particularly recognized for its comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Sangfor Endpoint Secure users find the product to be competitively priced with speedy ROI. WatchGuard EPDR is perceived as more expensive but justified by its advanced feature set, leading to strong returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"The tool's AI feature is helpful in endpoint security."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"Great technical support staff."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

"We have control over our devices, specifically USB ports, allowing us to block or control the traffic."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"I face issues while migrating from Kaspersky to Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard."

"I would rate Panda Adaptive Defense 360 overall eight points because I still try to find another solution that is easier for me, which can provide what I currently have in Panda Adaptive Defense 360."

"I would like to see better data protection."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."

"Their MacOS support isn't that good."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"The product is available at a high price."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

I think the pricing is normal because we subscribe for three years. Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 23% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 3% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 17% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

July 2025

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.