RSA enVision vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

RSA and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. RSA is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0, while Seceon is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.4. RSA holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of RSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

RSA enVision

Read 6 RSA enVision reviews

537 Views
532 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,132 Views
1,121 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

RSA enVision

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

RSA enVision and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are two leading cybersecurity solutions. Based on user reviews, Seceon appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat detection and automated response features, quicker deployment, and better ROI.

Features: Users value RSA enVision's comprehensive logging, event management, and detailed reporting capabilities. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is noted for its advanced threat detection, automated response, and machine learning integration.

Room for Improvement: RSA enVision users want better integration capabilities, more streamlined updates, and enhanced user documentation. Seceon users desire an improved threat intelligence database, enhanced user customization options, and more detailed alert explanations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA enVision's deployment model is praised for its robustness, though it is complex and time-consuming. Its customer service is reliable but sometimes slow. Seceon has simpler, quicker deployment and highly responsive customer support, making it attractive for environments needing fast implementation and immediate assistance.

Pricing and ROI: RSA enVision is favored for its transparent pricing structure. Seceon is perceived to deliver better ROI due to its lower initial setup costs and rapid value realization through efficient threat management and lower ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RSA enVision

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

28th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of RSA enVision is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1093020

Cyber Security and Compliance Lead Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly

I rate the initial setup a seven and a half out of ten. So, it's closer to seven. The tool is deployed in our organization on-premises with some test servers. In only two tests in a test environment, the deployment can be carried out. The deployment time only depends on the size of your infrastructure. If I limit the company's size, it will not take too much time. So, it can be done in seven to eight hours. Regarding the deployment process, we have managed some test servers, after which we need to install some agents. If you include more servers, you need to install more agents. If you want to use agent-based, I would say that it is totally up to the stakeholder. You will get some additional benefits if you can choose the agent since you will be more assured that less positive false positive results you will get from the tool. For deployment, one test server, a few deployment servers, and some policy configurations are done by the OEM with some local support. We used some Windows servers and Linux servers, and we installed some agents in different types of operating systems. So different versions of Linux and different versions of Windows. We also integrate some network devices like firewalls to integrate firewalls and logs. So, the amount of logs and firewalls is too much. I have to engage too many employees for deployment. So there are those for Linux servers, others for Windows servers, and the rest for network devices. One for SIEM policy creation and one for SIEM management administration is also required.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We developed around this solution and received excellent support from the company."

"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."

"The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."

"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."

"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."

"Licensing could be improved to be more oriented towards Managed Service Providers (MSPs)."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing a six."

"We no longer pay a licensing fee because it is out of date and don't pay for support."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with RSA enVision?

Licensing could be improved to be more oriented towards Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Perhaps offering different types of licensing would be beneficial, as it can be expensive for industries wi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA enVision?

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. I recommend using it, but it also depends on the needs and the budget. If I still had my company, I think we would continue using RSA enVision. However, ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RSA enVision?

It's competitive, but they need to adapt to MSPs. Maybe that's not their target market, though.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs RSA enVision

Compared 47% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs RSA enVision

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs RSA enVision

Compared 18% of the time

Wazuh vs RSA enVision

Compared 14% of the time

More RSA enVision Competitors

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 14% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2025

Download RSA enVision product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

July 2025

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

RSA enVision is a comprehensive security information and event management (SIEM) solution offered by RSA, a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions. It enables organizations to collect, analyze, and manage security event data from various sources, providing real-time visibility into their IT infrastructure. With RSA enVision, organizations can proactively detect and respond to security incidents, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.

The solution offers a wide range of features, including log management, event correlation, threat intelligence, and compliance reporting. One of the key strengths of RSA enVision is its ability to collect and normalize data from diverse sources, such as network devices, servers, applications, and databases. This allows organizations to gain a holistic view of their security posture and identify potential threats or vulnerabilities.

The event correlation capabilities of RSA enVision enable the detection of complex attack patterns and the identification of potential security incidents. By analyzing events in real-time and correlating them with historical data, the solution can provide actionable insights and alerts to security teams, enabling them to respond quickly and effectively. RSA enVision also offers advanced threat intelligence capabilities, leveraging machine learning and behavioral analytics to identify anomalous activities and potential indicators of compromise. This helps organizations stay ahead of emerging threats and proactively mitigate risks.

RSA enVision provides comprehensive compliance reporting capabilities, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and demonstrate adherence to industry standards. The solution offers pre-built compliance reports for various regulations, such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR, simplifying the audit process and reducing compliance-related costs. In summary, RSA enVision is a powerful SIEM solution that enables organizations to effectively manage their security events, detect and respond to threats, and meet compliance requirements.

With its robust features and capabilities, it provides organizations with the necessary tools to enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect their critical assets.

RSA

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

BPS (SUISSE), Hypovereinsbank Germany, MAX Hamburgers, Infoplex, Neotel, Telus

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

July 2025

Free Report: RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.