We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

RSA Authentication Manager vs SafeNet Authentication Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Authentication Manager vs. SafeNet Authentication Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the SecurID.""I have found RSA Authentication Manager to be scalable."

More RSA Authentication Manager Pros →

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication.""I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP.""Scalable and stable."

More SafeNet Authentication Manager Pros →

Cons
"We are not planning on using the solution in the future.""Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud systems. Cloud identification is our main problem at this time."

More RSA Authentication Manager Cons →

"Lacks integration with other platforms.""The stability could improve.""The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

More SafeNet Authentication Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is a little bit complicated because sometimes resellers are able to make prices that are too low. Our price, with a discount, is typically not as high as some of our competitors."
  • More RSA Authentication Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The most valuable feature is the SecurID.
    Top Answer: 
    Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I rate RSA Authentication Manager an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer: 
    I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP.
    Top Answer: 
    The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    2,187
    Comparisons
    1,836
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    111
    Rating
    8.0
    11th
    Views
    1,523
    Comparisons
    1,304
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    186
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ACE/Server
    Learn More
    SafeNet
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.
    SafeNet Authentication Manager (SAM) is a comprehensive versatile authentication server that allows organizations to implement a future-ready strong authentication strategy for securing local and remote access to numerous corporate resources using a single authentication back end. SAM supports a broad range of authentication methods and form factors – including context-based authentication with step-up capabilities, one-time password (OTP), X.509 certificate-based tokens, and software tokens – enabling organizations to meet different assurance levels and address numerous use cases.
    Offer
    Learn more about RSA Authentication Manager
    Learn more about SafeNet Authentication Manager
    Sample Customers
    Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County
    Exostar, Fraser Health, BSkyB, SETMA, Beckman Coulter, Sunrise Health Region, Seattle Children's, AXA Technology Services, Baker Tilly, University of Poland, Devon IT, Pfizer, SEW-EURODRIVE, SYSteam
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Authentication Manager vs. SafeNet Authentication Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RSA Authentication Manager is ranked 12th in Authentication Systems with 2 reviews while SafeNet Authentication Manager is ranked 11th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. RSA Authentication Manager is rated 8.0, while SafeNet Authentication Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of RSA Authentication Manager writes "Helpful support, simple installation, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeNet Authentication Manager writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". RSA Authentication Manager is most compared with Microsoft Authenticator, Duo Security, Entrust IdentityGuard, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA Adaptive Authentication, whereas SafeNet Authentication Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiToken, Yubico YubiKey, Duo Security, Microsoft Authenticator and CRYPTOCARD BlackShield. See our RSA Authentication Manager vs. SafeNet Authentication Manager report.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.