Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs Toad for Oracle comparison

Redgate and Quest Software are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Redgate is ranked #8, while Quest Software is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. Redgate holds a 6.1% mindshare in DDM, compared to Quest Software’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Redgate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Read 2 Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials reviews

1,258 Views
578 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Toad for Oracle

Read 16 Toad for Oracle reviews

1,203 Views
549 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Toad for Oracle

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials and Toad for Oracle are popular solutions in database management. Toad for Oracle has the upper hand with its robust feature set, although Redgate offers straightforward pricing and support.

Features: Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is known for efficient code deployment, version control, and performance monitoring. Toad for Oracle provides extensive PL/SQL editing capabilities, automation tools, and in-depth database analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is recognized for quick setup and a responsive support team. Toad for Oracle might need a more complex initial deployment but includes strong support features.

Pricing and ROI: Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials appeals with lower upfront costs, focusing on value through streamlined processes. Toad for Oracle, with higher setup costs, offers a rich feature set that can enhance productivity, potentially delivering higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Ranking in Database Development and Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Toad for Oracle

Ranking in Database Development and Management

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is 6.1%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad for Oracle is 5.5%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

ChristopherSmith1

Director, Enterprise Data Management at Glatfelter Insurance Group

SQL Search and change automation functionality help us manage our code repository and databases

The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources. It takes a lot of memory and a lot of processing power to run, and that tends to slow things down a bit. Making it a little more lightweight while still doing the same thing, as much as possible, is what we would like to see in the future. I've noticed that Microsoft SSMS runs much quicker without RedGate installed than it does with it installed. From bootup of the app to opening query windows and connections, SSMS is quicker without Redgate than with, by a significant margin. The other area for improvement is regarding licensing. Every month or two my SSMS loses it's redgate license key and I need to re-enter the key to continue using Red Gate, even though the license is annual.

Read full review

Joseph Jolly

Manager Software Engineering at URA

Highly stable solution and efficiently pinpoints specific areas with issues, which has saved us time troubleshooting.

I think one area is being able to use shortcuts, for example, being able to press F5 to run a query or having the ability to seamlessly copy and paste. Sometimes it works in some areas, but in others, it doesn't. Like when you copy, you find that it's blank and doesn't copy anything. So, there are some objects that do copy, and sometimes they don't. In additional features, I would like maybe one for the integration with the ticketing system. For example, if a ticket is raised to resolve an issue, there should be something that I can click on to update the ticket when I'm done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to track the reports, this is what is most valuable for me."

"The most valuable feature is SQL Search."

"Oracle has advanced query optimization and tuning features that help improve the performance of SQL queries."

"The best product for working with Oracle databases for support, checking and loading data."

"Toad has a lot of features that are very useful, fast, and well developed."

"I find Toad easy to use and I love the Workspace feature, which allows me to set up projects so that I can open SQL files applicable to what I am working on at any particular time."

"Toad for Oracle has proven to be better than other tools since we have never experienced any crashes."

"The tool evaluates non-optimized queries and generates the queries in a way that is more optimal - in addition to giving us some good practices for code development."

"Simply the best GUI software for administration is the most valuable aspect for me."

"The schema browser is the most valuable feature. The way it presents the objects in our database."

More Toad for Oracle pros

Cons

"I would like to see the bandwidth increase allowing me to easily analyze more data."

"The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources."

"I'd like reporting to be more available. If it was a feature that was already installed, more people would take advantage of it."

"Query optimization is still very resource-intensive."

"An area where the solution could use some improvement is in terms of user-friendliness. During the initial setup phase, the solution was not very intuitive when attempting to establish connections."

"It would be beneficial if Toad for Oracle could incorporate OEM features, as having monitoring capabilities in the same interface would simplify workload and management tasks."

"There may be an issue with processing limitations but this cannot be confirmed as a problem with the product or with the newest releases."

"It would be better if they had an online option allowing me to connect from anywhere on any device. Sometimes I face some errors, depending on the network and setup. It's not a big issue."

"Improvement wise, for the user it should show the minimum features on the screen and not all the features. Toad has a lot of features, but most users will use only 5 or 10 based on their role. Nobody needs all the features, and they should provide the option to choose only the required features. Only minimum requirements should be enabled by default. When all the features are shown, the performance is not good; it loads slowly and has hundreds of popups and unnecessary questions."

"Sometimes it works in some areas, but in others, it doesn't. Like when you copy, you find that it's blank and doesn't copy anything. So, there are some objects that do copy, and sometimes they don't."

More Toad for Oracle cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is about $3,500 USD per individual to buy, and then it's about 20% per year for renewal."

"Our fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The product's pricing is just right because if it were slightly higher, it would not have been as widely adopted as it currently is in our organization."

"I would rate it six, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"My advice is to try to use the three-year maintenance agreement if possible."

"The pricing is okay, it's reasonable."

"The professional edition is about $1,000 AUD ($700 USD) and the developer version is about twice that much."

"In my opinion, this solution is a little expensive, but I understand that good programs cost more money."

"There are paid and free-for-use versions of the product."

"Toad for Oracle has a relatively high cost compared to other similar tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Toad for Oracle?

The product's most valuable features are UI and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad for Oracle?

The licensing cost for Toad for Oracle is relatively high, with their license and DPA suite totaling around five thousand dollars.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad for Oracle?

It would be beneficial if Toad for Oracle could incorporate OEM features, as having monitoring capabilities in the same interface would simplify workload and management tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 21% of the time

Quest Spotlight vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 12% of the time

Quest Foglight for Databases vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 11% of the time

Toad Data Modeler vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 9% of the time

More Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials Competitors

Toad Edge vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 24% of the time

Toad Data Modeler vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 14% of the time

DbVisualizer vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 11% of the time

Aqua Data Studio vs Toad for Oracle

Compared 10% of the time

More Toad for Oracle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2025

Download Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad for Oracle

April 2025

Download Toad for Oracle product report

Overview

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials provides DBA teams with advanced tools for SQL development and deployment. It enhances productivity by simplifying complex tasks related to database management.

Designed for professionals managing SQL databases, Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers an integrated suite to streamline development pipelines and ensure deployments are efficient and error-free. It supports SQL code management, version control, and automated deployments, making it indispensable for organizations focusing on database performance and management. Its ease of integration and intuitive functionalities cater specifically to an audience that requires precision and reliability in database administration, providing an effective solution for maintaining high standards in database operations.

What are the most valuable features?

Version Control: Seamless integration with source control systems for managing SQL code changes.
Deployment Automation: Streamlines deployment processes, reducing human error and maintenance time.
Code Comparison: Highlights differences in SQL codes for better decision-making and debugging.
Performance Monitoring: Tools to monitor database processes and optimize performance effectively.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, reducing manual oversight and freeing up valuable resources.
Risk Mitigation: Advanced version control and change tracking reduce database-related risks.
Time Savings: Speeds up development and deployment cycles, providing quicker turnarounds.

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials finds application in industries managing significant data workloads like finance, healthcare, and retail. Its deployment features ensure seamless integration into existing infrastructure, supporting critical operations dependent on robust database architecture. It aligns with industry-specific demands by offering reliable solutions tailored with precision.

Redgate

With Toad for Oracle, you'll reduce costs and risks by easily ensuring the health and performance of your Oracle Cloud Platform and on-premises databases. ... On the operations side, you can automate administration tasks and proactively manage your databases while embracing performance optimization and risk mitigation.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Thinger.fi, Churchill College Univeristy of Cambridge, Margin Business Solutions Ltd., 4Penny.net, Sportinginsider.net, Lockheed Martin, Phillip Securities Pte Ltd, Nmbrs

intel, ebay, uber, mars, microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle

April 2025

Free Report: Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle

Find out what your peers are saying about Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs. Toad for Oracle report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.