Ranorex Studio vs TestObject comparison

Ranorex and Sauce Labs are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Ranorex is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sauce Labs is ranked #15. Ranorex holds a 8.3% mindshare in MTT, compared to Sauce Labs’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

1,041 Views
777 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review

74 Views
32 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

TestObject

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ranorex Studio and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Mobile App Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,042 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

TestObject

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 8.3%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestObject is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

RajeevSAwant

Head Automation CoE at Truglobal

Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation

This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features. It has integrated seamlessly with our framework and provides very wide coverage. It offers very comprehensive reporting and allows us to drill down to the various levels of the automation and respective application performance. What TestObject provides is not available from other service providers. The kind of detailed reporting provided is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Object identification is good."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The solution is stable."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

Cons

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

May 2025

Download TestObject product report

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

Sauce Labs

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

BW Bank, Telefonica

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.