No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management vs Seemplicity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys Enterprise TruRisk M...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Seemplicity
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
6th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (31st), Cloud Security Remediation (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seemplicity is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Seemplicity2.6%
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management2.5%
Other94.9%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Ajay Paul - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Vulnerability management has prioritized high‑risk patching and simplified bulk system reporting
The primary issue is with the reporting functionality. Even though we fix vulnerabilities, the reports do not reflect the changes immediately. Sometimes we need to manually run a script to scan the systems before Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management will update the scan results. The main issue is the reporting delay, and sometimes the Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management agent will not scan the system, which means we do not receive accurate reports in a timely manner. Additionally, there are many metrics for calculating vulnerabilities, such as the Qualys ID, severity scores, CVSS scores, and other metrics. The abundance of information can be confusing. These two aspects are the most significant negatives I have experienced with this tool.
JL
Vice President Of Security Architecture And Engineering at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Unified vulnerability data has reduced risk and currently cuts duplicate tools and license costs
Seemplicity can be improved by adding additional graphs and charts that make it easier to do trending over time. I had to do some of that manually via manual reports, but Seemplicity already has a feature request for this. Seemplicity has done a pretty good job of keeping up with integrations. One gap that I identified and that Seemplicity is trying to fill now is having a complete end-to-end mapping. Seemplicity currently looks at the external attack surface using tools like Censys, and then looks at the internal side, examining what is in AWS and other clouds using CSPM. However, there is not anything that currently ties a property on the outside to a system on the inside, especially when you have additional security layers like web application firewalls that actually mitigate the risk.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Regarding its competitors in the market, I believe Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management has a strong offering."
"Risk-based prioritization is a new feature with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management, and overall, the vulnerability posture of our organization has improved significantly."
"Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is a very good software application to scan each and every vulnerability and, through that, it prevents the attackers from exploiting the systems, servers, or our data and prevents data leaks in short."
"For vulnerability management, Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is very good for our organization."
"Qualys is a very good tool for companies, and the different tools this brand offers bring all the necessary tools for good development for these companies."
"I think of Seemplicity as a fantastic company and a fantastic partner to work with."
"When we started with Seemplicity, we saw an 85% reduction in the number of tickets through deduplication, and that is significant for our teams who are swamped with issues."
"The biggest impact Seemplicity has had on my organization is turning what used to be a fragmented, manual process into something structured and accountable."
"Seemplicity has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce the overhead for our SecOps team to manually create vulnerability tickets."
"I was also able to pay for the tool twice over by using it for tool rationalization."
"Before we really struggled with meeting SLAs that were in place because we did not have the information we needed and there was too much back and forth, now we nearly have a perfect SLA meeting time."
"Seemplicity is helping us generate immense ROI in terms of helping secure our infrastructure, applications, endpoints, and understanding vulnerabilities that we really did not have a good process of understanding before."
"We have seen improvements in remediation rates, as initially a lot of our metrics were in the red, but now all are in the green or yellow."
 

Cons

"Second, the remedies provided by Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management are sometimes not useful most of the time. In that case, we need to troubleshoot or find out the remedies by ourselves."
"However, I am not satisfied with Qualys support. The response time is slower than needed."
"Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is a big platform, and the initial deployment is tedious."
"The main issue is the reporting delay, and sometimes the Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management agent will not scan the system, which means we do not receive accurate reports in a timely manner."
"When a customer does not have control over vulnerabilities or architecture and needs a solution that automates this function for the company, it can be difficult to identify the vulnerabilities."
"Seemplicity can be improved by adding additional graphs and charts that make it easier to do trending over time."
"As the account is growing, some of the dashboards are slowing down, so optimizing that could be one area for improvement."
"For Seemplicity, I would say two things for improvement. First, reporting customization could go further because this industry is evolving; the CEO tries to get much information that they are looking for."
"Seemplicity could be improved with some of the aggregation accessibility. Currently, it is a bit of a black box and can be a bit of a bottleneck."
"The capability out of the box today is decent, but over time, if we can allow users and organizations to build their own view and how they want to report on things, that would be a great value add."
"Seemplicity could use more improvement around the user interface."
"Every tool, including Seemplicity, can improve, and I think it needs to further enhance its deduplication capabilities and understand how to integrate with more security tools, especially as new AI security tools emerge."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
37%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Hospitality Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is a big platform, and the initial deployment is tedious. Licensing and features are somewhat complex for new customers, and that area could be improved.
What is your primary use case for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
We are using Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management for vulnerability management. It identifies, prioritizes, and remediates vulnerabilities while focusing on the business risk itself. The latest Tru...
What advice do you have for others considering Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
We reach out to customer support for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management occasionally, and it is quite easy to reach them. False positives are the main issue that we encounter and need to be handl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seemplicity?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Seemplicity was great. They gave us unlimited licensing for automation and we have a lot of tools at Omnicell, so it has been very easy to ...
What needs improvement with Seemplicity?
Seemplicity could be improved with some of the aggregation accessibility. Currently, it is a bit of a black box and can be a bit of a bottleneck. It would be nice if customers could perform the agg...
What is your primary use case for Seemplicity?
My main use case for Seemplicity is ticketing all of our security findings to the service teams for remediation and prioritization. I use Seemplicity for our security tools such as Wiz in the SaaS ...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management vs. Seemplicity and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.