QoreStor vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Quest Software and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Quest Software is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Quest Software holds a 1.7% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

4,102 Views
984 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

7,999 Views
6,799 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

QoreStor

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

QoreStor and VMware Live Recovery compete in the data protection and recovery space. VMware Live Recovery is considered superior for its advanced recovery features, while QoreStor stands out with attractive pricing and robust support, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers.

Features: QoreStor provides efficient data deduplication, high backup performance, and cloud tier support, enhancing storage savings and data transfer efficiency. VMware Live Recovery offers real-time recovery capabilities, seamless integration with virtual environments, and comprehensive failover solutions. The key differentiator is QoreStor's focus on storage efficiency versus VMware Live Recovery's advanced restoration features.

Room for Improvement: QoreStor could benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing replication features. The integration flexibility could also be expanded. VMware Live Recovery, while strong in many areas, might improve in cost reduction strategies and expand third-party integrations. Additionally, augmenting its recovery testing features could enhance its utility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Live Recovery offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive technical support, minimizing setup downtime. QoreStor, though offering reliable customer service, has a more complex deployment process, requiring additional effort during the setup phase.

Pricing and ROI: QoreStor is generally more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, offering storage optimization benefits that enhance ROI over time. VMware Live Recovery, while more expensive upfront, provides a compelling ROI through rapid recovery speeds critical for mission-critical environments. The contrast lies in QoreStor's affordability and long-term savings versus VMware Live Recovery's higher investment yet faster recovery advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QoreStor

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

27th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (50th), Data Replication (9th), Disk Based Backup Systems (8th), Storage Software (4th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (19th), Copy Data Management (6th), File and Object Storage (23rd)

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of QoreStor is 1.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.0%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.0%
QoreStor	1.7%
Other	91.3%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dedupe and compression are pretty extreme. On disk, we're getting dedupe rates of up to 65 percent of data and compression of 34 percent. When you go to the cloud, it's more like 76 percent for dedupe and almost 50 percent for compression."

"Since we started to resell QoreStor, we have been using it internally; it's better than other backup solutions we have used or evaluated."

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"The extreme compression of data is a big thing for us. We were looking for an online backup solution, and QoreStor is very good in terms of data compression. It helps us minimize the required storage in the Blob Storage environment."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises. We've been using the same devices for quite a while, and so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution. The advantage here is even if we had to retire the hardware tomorrow, the QoreStor part doesn't change. We just have to have additional hardware and put the solution back on whatever hardware we pick and it'll do the same thing."

"This software solution can be installed on many different types of hardware, which makes it very flexible. We can run it on virtual machines or virtual servers, providing convenience for solutions of varying sizes, from small to large."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises, and we've been using the same devices for quite a while, so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution."

"The features we use for the data deduplication are nice because we're able to back up a much larger amount of data, yet it doesn't necessarily take up that much data on the devices."

More QoreStor pros

"We feel the ability to move virtual machines while they are still running to be the most valuable feature."

"The stability is great, there are no bugs or glitches, it does not crash or freeze, and it is reliable."

"I like how VMware SRM is able to automate and orchestrate disaster recovery."

"This is the most stable solution that I have seen."

"The solution helps to improve business continuity processes. Its automatic failover and failback policies have been wonderful."

"Site Recovery Manager is valuable because it helps with the difficult problem of failing a group of virtual machines over to your DR site and bringing them up."

"I like how VMware SRM is able to automate and orchestrate disaster recovery."

"We have had some customers that were hit with some random wear and we were able to restore the files from SRM with minimal downtime."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"The installation could use improvement. The initial installation was a little touchy and it's not really user-installable. You have to have a connection to support to install."

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something."

"The management interface is in need of improvement. The graphical user interface (GUI) for the web management tools appears clunky, and not super intuitive."

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something. So that when we don't do a backup, we want the QoreStor to stay offline. It would be a nice feature to have."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial. After everything is set up and configured, there should be a way to export the configuration. In case something happens to the QoreStor server, and we need to reinstall and configure everything, being able to import the configuration would be helpful. This feature does not currently exist."

"The ransomware protection of QoreStor could use improvement."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

More QoreStor cons

"Deployment is fairly straight forward but it still requires a good amount of VMware experience on the architecture side to properly deploy and scale."

"I would like to see better integration with other storage solutions."

"The licenses need to be easier to quote."

"We are limited to 50 VMs."

"The support could be improved, they are slow."

"The pricing structure is pretty expensive, especially after the recent changes, and it's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production."

"It is impossible to acquire Datrium data nodes, unfortunately."

"Automatic guest customizations through a GUI is a missing feature. Also the new version of SRM is web-only and is not that stable as the old client version."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"Mature products like VMware SRM often have higher costs."

"VMware SRM is expensive when compared to Veeam and makes Veeam look cheaper. For support, some additional payments need to be made over the licensing costs of the solution."

"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"VMware SRM is an expensive solution, and users need to pay extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"VMware SRM is a little bit pricey."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"The software is expensive. There is a one-time cost involved in purchasing the license."

"The price of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery should be lowered in order to compete better in the market."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We are the partner as well as the integrator, and we mostly work in the integration industry. Integration is our core business, but we also do partnership activities. Most of our projects are based...

See all answers

Comparisons

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs QoreStor

Compared 2% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 33% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

April 2026

Download QoreStor product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

QoreStor

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

VMware Live Recovery offers seamless disaster recovery with automation, ease of use, and integration with VMware environments. It supports a wide array of storage vendors, ensuring business continuity with effective replication and recovery of VMs.

VMware Live Recovery is recognized for its automation in disaster recovery, valuable integration with extensive VMware environments, and its ability to support a multitude of storage vendors. The platform provides features like re-protect, automated recovery, and non-disruptive testing with a user-friendly interface simplifying management tasks. Users benefit from policy-based protection and centralized management, boosting operational efficiency. The ability to replicate and recover virtual machines with minimal intervention facilitates business continuity across different sites. However, there's room for improvement in database integration, virtual appliance offerings for SRM, and a less complex licensing model. Enhancements in stability, technical support, clearer setup documentation, and broader integration with third-party tools are equally important.

What are VMware Live Recovery's standout features?

Re-Protect: Enables efficient site recovery with seamless workflow reversal.
Automated Recovery: Simplifies disaster recovery with minimal manual steps.
Non-Disruptive Testing: Allows validation of recovery plans without service interruption.
Policy-based Protection: Facilitates streamlined management with automated protection policies.
Centralized Management: Supports unified control across extensive environments.

Which benefits and ROI should users focus on when evaluating VMware Live Recovery?

Business Continuity: Ensures operations remain unaffected during disruptions.
Reduced Recovery Time: Minimizes downtime with efficient failover processes.
Integration Versatility: Compatible with a wide range of storage vendors.
Operational Efficiency: Automation and management tools simplify complex tasks.

Organizations leverage VMware Live Recovery primarily for disaster recovery, enabling data replication and continuity across multiple locations. Essential in facilitating failover automation, it helps maintain critical services and execute disaster recovery drills effectively. It supports data center migrations, site replication, and testing recovery processes. Through protecting virtual machines and applications, it guarantees service reliability even during outages or planned maintenance, serving industries focused on data security and operational uptime.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Free Report: QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.