QoreStor vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Quest Software and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Quest Software is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Quest Software holds a 0.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

1,790 Views
286 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

5,329 Views
4,476 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

QoreStor

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

QoreStor and VMware Live Recovery are competing products in data protection and recovery. VMware Live Recovery has the upper hand with advanced features and integration benefits that enhance performance and reliability.

Features: QoreStor offers data deduplication, compression, and cloud-tiering capabilities to optimize storage usage. VMware Live Recovery provides rapid data recovery with minimal downtime, integration with VMware environments, and automated disaster recovery capabilities.

Room for Improvement: QoreStor could enhance its integration capabilities with diverse environments, improve on its advanced feature set, and expand its cloud support. VMware Live Recovery could simplify its deployment process, offer more competitive pricing, and improve customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QoreStor provides a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive and responsive customer support. VMware Live Recovery, while robust, involves complexity in deployment but benefits existing VMware users with its integration. Its customer service relies on an established network.

Pricing and ROI: QoreStor is known for competitive pricing and strong ROI due to lower setup costs and efficient storage management, making it suitable for cost-conscious buyers. VMware Live Recovery, though more costly initially, offers high ROI from reduced downtime and integration benefits, appealing to those prioritizing performance.

To learn more, read our detailed QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QoreStor

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (53rd), Data Replication (11th), Disk Based Backup Systems (8th), Storage Software (5th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (21st), Copy Data Management (6th), File and Object Storage (22nd)

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of QoreStor is 0.9%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.3%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.3%
QoreStor	0.9%
Other	91.8%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Calvin Hilgenstock

System Administrator at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

Cost savings and efficient data management improve operations but support quality varies

The importance of support is significant to me. I was working for a service provider, and all of our customers had a Quest or warning. Sometimes the support really underperforms. I always had to get it escalated or ask for someone specifically because those other people would just read knowledge-based articles that I had already done myself. Quest QoreStor does not work with any backup software, server, or storage hardware. It has the hardware compatibility list, and you need a specific number of IOPS, so it needs to run on decent hardware at least to have enough input-output operations. Otherwise, the setup result will be canceled. I'm not too sure if there are still physical appliances, but when I first started, we had some customers with a physical Quest QoreStor appliance, and it would only run on certain hardware. It doesn't work with every backup program. For example, Veritas Backup Exec is incompatible, but Veeam is compatible, and V Ranger is compatible as well. I didn't even know that Quest QoreStor has any static AI and behavioral AI technologies.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We need revisions and safe backup so that it could be held up in court, but deduplication and compression are the main features why we have Quest QoreStor. That's where it really shines. I use ZFS and XFS at home, and Quest QoreStor is even better."

"I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"Quest QoreStor definitely saved us money."

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"Quest QoreStor is very stable compared to our previous solution."

"The features we use for the data deduplication are nice because we're able to back up a much larger amount of data, yet it doesn't necessarily take up that much data on the devices."

"Deduplication is the most valuable feature. It saves us a lot of space. When we back up 100 terabytes of data, after dedupe, it only uses maybe five to six terabytes for the disk space in QoreStor."

More QoreStor pros

"This SRM solution can improve your footprint within a data center."

"The community provides good knowledge, so I can get answers if I have special inquiries."

"It eliminates the need for complex compliance requirements, making it a highly effective solution."

"The solution helps to improve business continuity processes. Its automatic failover and failback policies have been wonderful."

"It made the DR process a lot faster and easier for recovery after we were familiar with the product operation."

"The solution is consistent."

"We mostly prefer to recommend this to customers due to ease of use, abundant features, and support."

"VMware SRM's most valuable features are its convenience and its use of stretched clusters."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something. So that when we don't do a backup, we want the QoreStor to stay offline. It would be a nice feature to have."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

"The importance of support is significant to me. I was working for a service provider, and all of our customers had a Quest or warning. Sometimes the support really underperforms."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

"The ransomware protection of QoreStor could use improvement."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial. After everything is set up and configured, there should be a way to export the configuration. In case something happens to the QoreStor server, and we need to reinstall and configure everything, being able to import the configuration would be helpful. This feature does not currently exist."

"The management interface is in need of improvement. The graphical user interface (GUI) for the web management tools appears clunky, and not super intuitive."

More QoreStor cons

"The improvements should be as per customer requirements."

"The administration guides can be complicated and difficult to use, so it would be helpful if it was made easier."

"VMware SRM lacks certain functions that other platforms have, such as better prioritization of allocation of resources and Boot profiles."

"In general, the drawbacks of VMware SRM, where improvements can be made, stem from the fact that it is an expensive and complex product."

"In my view, if VMware comes up with an appliance-based solution like vCenter Server (which was also Windows-based), it will be much easier for deployment. I"

"We would like the patching management function of this product to be improved."

"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."

"Cost is definitely an area where the product could be improved."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

"After Broadcom acquired the solution, the licensing cost increased drastically"

"I rate the solution's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"VMware SRM is quite expensive."

"Compare to hardware-based replication, I think software based replication is best and cheap."

"The licensing costs for the product are perpetual in nature. A person needs to buy the license only once there is a need to buy support on a yearly basis. The licensing cost for VMware SRM is expensive."

"VMware SRM is expensive when compared to Veeam and makes Veeam look cheaper. For support, some additional payments need to be made over the licensing costs of the solution."

"The cost of SRM is on par with market rates."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 11% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs QoreStor

Compared 8% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs QoreStor

Compared 8% of the time

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs QoreStor

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Avamar vs QoreStor

Compared 7% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 29% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

January 2026

Download QoreStor product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

January 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

QoreStor

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Free Report: QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QoreStor vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.