• Home
  • Prevalent vs. SecurityScorecard

Prevalent vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Prevalent Logo

Prevalent

206 views|168 comparisons
SecurityScorecard Logo

SecurityScorecard

Read 4 SecurityScorecard reviews
2,190 views|1,250 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IT Vendor Risk Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Prevalent and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Prevalent?
Jai Prakash Sharma
A reasonably stable product that provides recommendations to improve the scores
This tool is a platform for monitoring and assessing the security posture of organizations and also helps to improve the posture by recommendations
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."
  • "Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

    • More SecurityScorecard Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster. As per the tool's SLAs, three days is way too much time for a user to wait for a response… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:This tool is a platform for monitoring and assessing the security posture of organizations and also helps to improve the posture by recommendations
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    206
    Comparisons
    168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    2,190
    Comparisons
    1,250
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    700
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Prevalent
    SecurityScorecard
    Overview

    Named a Leader in The Forrester New Wave™: Cybersecurity Risk Ratings Solutions, Q4 2018, Prevalent is helping global organizations manage and monitor the security threats and risks associated with third and fourth party vendors.

    Prevalent introduced the only unified platform for Third Party Risk Management and the first vendor evidence sharing portal that enables collaboration between both enterprises and vendors.

    Funded by world-class investors including Evolution Equity Partners, Silver Lake Partners, Sequoia Capital, GV, Riverwood Capital, and others, SecurityScorecard is the global leader in cybersecurity ratings with more than 12 million companies continuously rated. Founded in 2013 by security and risk experts Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy and Sam Kassoumeh, SecurityScorecard’s patented rating technology is used by over 25,000 organizations for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, board reporting, due diligence, cyber insurance underwriting, and regulatory oversight. SecurityScorecard continues to make the world a safer place by transforming the way companies understand, improve and communicate cybersecurity risk to their boards, employees and vendors. Every organization has the universal right to their trusted and transparent Instant SecurityScorecard rating. For more information, visit securityscorecard.com or connect with us on LinkedIn.

    Sample Customers
    Yale, Mars, Tesco, Lbrands, Pfizer
    TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Educational Organization11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Vendor Risk Management
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Prevalent is ranked 17th in IT Vendor Risk Management while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Prevalent is rated 0.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Prevalent is most compared with ProcessUnity, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon and Tenable Nessus.

    See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.