Polarion ALM vs Visure Requirements ALM Platform comparison

Siemens and Visure Solutions are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Visure Solutions is ranked #24. Siemens holds a 8.2% mindshare in ALM, compared to Visure Solutions’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Siemens users are willing to recommend the solution.

Polarion ALM

Read 22 Polarion ALM reviews

3,837 Views
2,560 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Visure Requirements ALM Pla...

153 Views
59 Comparison Views

Polarion ALM

Visure Requirements ALM Pla...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Polarion ALM and Visure Requirements ALM Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (6th)

Visure Requirements ALM Pla...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

24th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Polarion ALM is 8.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visure Requirements ALM Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Dina Bindi

Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial

Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility

It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.

Read full review

Use Visure Requirements ALM Platform?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Polarion ALM?

It is a very stable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates. Sometimes, database migrations take too long, spanning two...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

As a manual tester, I use Polarion ALM ( /products/polarion-alm-reviews ) for our weekly builds validation. These builds are crucial as they eventually lead to final release builds for customers. I...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 30% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 15% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 8% of the time

PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM

Compared 6% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Jama Connect vs Visure Requirements ALM Platform

Compared 100% of the time

More Visure Requirements ALM Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

May 2025

Download Polarion ALM product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download Visure Requirements ALM Platform product report

Overview

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens

With Visure Requirements ALM Platform you can create, edit and manage requirements easily within the tool. This enables your team to simplify the Requirements Capture process by gathering complete and precise requirements to deliver products that meet the customer needs and align business with engineering.

Visure Solutions

Sample Customers

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.