Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Microsoft and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Planview is ranked #14. Microsoft holds a 5.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews

3,210 Views
1,669 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

1,876 Views
844 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

In the project and portfolio management category, Microsoft Project Server and Planview Daptiv are prominent solutions. Microsoft Project Server appears to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration with Microsoft applications, making it well-suited for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Features: Microsoft Project Server provides comprehensive resource allocation, global visibility, and project data aggregation within a single platform. Users find it adaptable and easy to use, particularly with Microsoft tools such as Excel. Integration with SharePoint enhances collaboration. Planview Daptiv is known for its strong portfolio management capabilities, strategic project linking, and robust reporting features. Its graphical scheduling and collaboration tools are also highly valued.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Project Server could benefit from better resource allocation algorithms, improved system integration, and more flexible reporting options. The on-premises version requires a more streamlined deployment and enhanced collaboration features. Planview Daptiv needs to refine features like reporting and capacity planning. An undo feature could significantly improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server offers diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, which introduce complexity and often require substantial IT involvement. Customer service experiences vary, reflecting inconsistencies in technical support efficiency. Planview Daptiv's private and public cloud options facilitate simpler deployment, with consistently favorable customer support ratings, although response time variability is noted.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Project Server is considered expensive, especially for smaller businesses, due to complex licensing tied to roles and infrastructure needs. While users acknowledge high costs, they justify it with the solution's robust features. Planview Daptiv, with lower costs structured around annual licenses based on user roles, offers a flexible and scalable model. Many users find Daptiv more cost-effective compared to standalone project software, delivering positive ROI, particularly for cloud-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 5.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Project Server	5.2%
Planview Daptiv	3.3%
Other	91.5%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

JorgeValenzuela

Owner at CPSTECH

Collaborative task management simplifies office work, but agile methodology features need enhancement

In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using cloud drives like OneDrive. Another feature is Kanban or other features such as Scrum with agile methodologies. Microsoft Project Server is limited and falls short in using agile methodologies, which is the most important issue to improve. Microsoft Project Server is a good product; it is possible to improve regarding enabling agile features because the teams in my work are using Trello and Jira products due to the blackboards, Kanban, and Scrum. To do activities and stopping activities is more comfortable and easier to use, making it more practical in my teamwork. These features do not exist in Microsoft Project Server.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The centralization of all projects baselines in Project Server gave us control over the process."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to understand and navigate."

"The most valuable feature of the Microsoft Project Server is the level of detail with which I can break down a task and check the dependencies."

"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."

"Microsoft Project Server is a powerful tool I've used for years."

"It has been helpful for calculating the time of completion of our projects and looking at the critical parts of our projects."

"I have seen a return on investment from the use of this solution, it has been good."

"Microsoft Project Server is quite a powerful tool and offers a good way of seeing dependencies and interactions, along with baselines."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"Microsoft Project Server needs improvement in the integration of more tools and syncing of Blockly tools on time."

"Project Server could be improved by simplifying how tasks are assigned and reviewed on a daily basis."

"Reporting is an area that needs to be worked on. It needs improvement."

"We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly."

"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."

"Risk and issues are stored in the project SharePoint but there is no real auto communication of assignments; there is no mechanism for automatic escalation (much needed)."

"It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else."

"The cost could be lower."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an inexpensive product."

"The product is expensive."

"There is a subscription model for different types of users for different types of roles."

"I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."

"There is an annual license required for this solution."

"Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than other solutions on the market. We purchase the license annually."

"I would rate the price a six out of ten."

"I rate the pricing a one out of ten because the price is way too high."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?

Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

April 2026

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

April 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Project Server streamlines project management with features like resource allocation, project scheduling, and SharePoint integration. It's valued for its intuitive interface and ability to provide comprehensive insights through advanced reporting and dashboards.

Designed to enhance collaboration and efficiency, Microsoft Project Server supports complex task management by integrating seamlessly with SharePoint. It offers tools like Gantt charts and timeline management for effective tracking. Users benefit from Excel and Power BI compatibility, enhancing analytical capabilities. Despite its powerful functionalities, users identify areas for improvement in tool integration, resource management, and collaboration features. There are calls for a modernized interface and more flexible pricing. While the cloud version boasts continuous updates, the on-premises model lags behind.

What are the main features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Allocation: Optimizes workload across projects.
Project Scheduling: Helps plan timelines effectively.
SharePoint Integration: Facilitates collaboration.
Gantt Charts: Visual timeline for task tracking.
Power BI Integration: Advanced data analytics capabilities.

What benefits should you look for in Microsoft Project Server reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Easy to navigate and learn.
Scalability: Adjusts to growing project demands.
Customization: Tailors to specific project needs.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive project overviews.

Microsoft Project Server finds its application across industries by providing tools for planning IT infrastructure and managing enterprise-level projects. It helps organizations document projects and manage portfolios, enabling clear visibility into performance through milestones and KPIs.

Microsoft

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

April 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.