No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pindrop Platform vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pindrop Platform
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Fraud Detection and Prevention (18th)
Ping Identity Platform
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (11th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Pindrop Platform is designed for Fraud Detection and Prevention and holds a mindshare of 2.2%, up 1.4% compared to last year.
Ping Identity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Authentication Systems, holds 2.9% mindshare, down 3.8% since last year.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Pindrop Platform2.2%
ThreatMetrix4.9%
Riskified3.4%
Other89.5%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform2.9%
Microsoft Entra ID5.9%
Okta Platform4.5%
Other86.7%
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Use Pindrop Platform?
Leave a review
AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys
Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
900,277 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Performing Arts
12%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with PingAccess?
The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...
What is your primary use case for PingAccess?
The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...
 

Also Known As

Pindrop Protect
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PSCU, Lloyd's Banking Group
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, BioCatch, ThreatMetrix and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: June 2026.
900,277 professionals have used our research since 2012.