Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Permiso vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Permiso
Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Permiso?
Share your opinion
Mohammed Nadeem Rais - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 23, 2024
The visibility and analytics from Securonix SIEM have become indispensable in identifying and stopping potential threats before they escalate.
We use Securonix Next-Gen SIEM primarily for managed SOC, focusing on threat detection, baselining, and ensuring the maturity of our SOC security operations.  It is integrated with threat intelligence and utilizes frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK and the Cyber Kill Chain.  The solution helps in threat…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Compared to other known brands in the industry, the overall cost of the licenses is a bit higher than what customers expect."
"Its pricing is quite similar to others and is very competitive. The other solutions have different types of licensing, but when you do the math, it is competitive."
"The pricing is fine compared to the market but I think that at some point the competitors will catch up on price."
"I rate the pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. It is a pretty expensive tool."
"The pricing is good, but by adding more things, the licensing becomes more complex because an EPS license fluctuates a lot. This licensing concept is going to be problematic in the long run."
"The solution's price is double the competitors."
"We have an annual license. We pay $200,000 for the base licensing and we pay another $50,000 for the software as a service."
"We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What do you like most about Securonix Security Analytics?
We can customize our use cases with the tools provided by Securonix. It is an excellent tool that can ingest data in different ways and is very flexible.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securonix Security Analytics?
The pricing is fine compared to the market but I think that at some point the competitors will catch up on price. It would be good if, for example, there were an option to offer customers who have ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Securonix Security Analytics
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dtex Systems, Pfizer, Western Union, Harris, ITG
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: September 2024.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.