We performed a comparison between Pega Robotic Process Automation and Robocorp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Using the tool actually ends up teaching you about making workflows more efficient."
"Pega is also broadening its landscape by building on top of PRPC (CRM, EPC, etc.), and with a cloud offering available, it is a genuine contender to compete with Salesforce."
"The solution's ability to create adapters quickly is its most valuable feature."
"Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow."
"They are leaders in the same industry."
"The initial setup is pretty easy and quite fast."
"Pega Robotic Process Automation's most valuable feature is that it is robust. Additionally, they have plenty of online documents that are good and Pega Academy is helpful, they are doing a great job. They give training on practical use cases. They take domain use cases, and they are great."
"I am impressed with the tool's recording feature."
"I have worked with UiPath and Automation Anywhere previously. Robocorp offers an improved development style and support as well as flexibility of its tools. You can easily develop custom libraries in Robocorp."
"The ability to create separate organizations on this platform makes it easier to bill each of the clients separately."
"The product has a valuable business process automation feature."
"Robocorp is based on Python, so you can use Python scripts and create libraries for your use cases. Building libraries and custom scripts for a particular client and general use cases is easy. We can reuse those scripts for other clients, so we start seeing benefits quickly."
"I can use it as a library by importing Python scripts, allowing me to access its many features while working with coding."
"I like the fact that it's very fast. The processing speed is good, and that's what matters to me. I also like that we don't have to bother with the infrastructure setup. We don't have to care about the status of the data set, as I believe the local group will provide it. We don't care about the licensing model. We only have to care about how long we are using it."
"It supports Python runtime because of that, runtime also improves."
"As a developer, I found it easy to integrate third-party applications with Robocorp. I have previous experience with Selenium, and I found the Robocorp framework to be accessible because it uses Python and Selenium keywords."
"In this modern world, in this automation space, if Pega could provide more options that are user-friendly and provide a way to quickly develop an automation solution that is drag-and-drop with a minimal coding approach, then it would be great for automation."
"The OCR capabilities of the solution could be improved."
"Pega Robotic Process Automation can improve the OGR area. You don't have a feature to read documents in computer voices."
"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."
"The ease-of-use could be improved."
"I have faced many scenarios in the business workflow, where a few applications run on the Citrix environment. That could be a critical part of the process without which business won't be able to accept the automation solution. Because of one small bottleneck, you will lose a very good candidate for process automation."
"I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements."
"The way integration classes are created could be improved."
"The solution could be more stable."
"I don't like the complexity of deployment."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly for non-technical users. It would be better if they had some drag-and-drop features to create logic."
"I preferred the user interface in the older versions. When troubleshooting, it's sometimes hard to find details about where things went wrong. You need to search a little harder. It takes more clicks to get to where you want to go. It can be somewhat confusing. When you run a process that fails, it takes you somewhere you may not expect."
"The standard libraries in Robocorp should be more advanced."
"Robocorp is still in development, so most of the keywords are a bit confusing. I have to alter lots of automation steps between processing and development. However, Selenium is due for an update soon, and Robcorp is addressing some of the limitations caused by the previous Selenium version."
"An additional feature I'm looking for in Robocorp is SAP automation."
"The platform's documentation could be better."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews while Robocorp is ranked 11th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 13 reviews. Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6, while Robocorp is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Robocorp writes "The Python base is very valuable for AI and data science but stability could improve". Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM, whereas Robocorp is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism Cloud and ElectroNeek. See our Pega Robotic Process Automation vs. Robocorp report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
