Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good.""Everything has been okay with the solution. We are using all of the features.""It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked.""You can scale the product.""I like the solution's interface."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pros →

"The technical support on offer is very good.""Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is very stable. In addition, the provider gives notice of any changes well in advance, which is important for planning updates.""What I like about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is that it works okay. I don't have time to mess with the tool most of the time because I have way too many tasks to do, but Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System tells you when there's a problem, then it blocks the problem, so that's what I like most about it.""It integrates easily."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is complex.""In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support.""The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement.""The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Cons →

"It integrates well but it takes time.""I find Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System a bit clunky, and updating it can be a pain in the neck because you need to do it from time to time, so this is what needs to be improved in it. I would also rather have an all-in-one system that does intrusion detection, protection, web filtering, and also serves as a firewall, and my company is moving to an all-in-one solution, but I'm unsure of how soon that's going to be. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System also doesn't have enough bandwidth to handle the required traffic within my company, so it's going to be replaced.""Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System needs strong Spanish-language support.""The solution is pretty expensive."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • "Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
  • "The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
    Top Answer:We pay for licensing on a yearly basis. You simply need to pay the licensing fee and there are no extra costs.
    Top Answer:Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is very stable. In addition, the provider gives notice of any changes well in advance, which is important for planning updates.
    Top Answer:I can't remember the cost of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System or if I was the person who paid for it because another person within my company could have handled that, so I'm unable to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    6,790
    Comparisons
    5,620
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    4,569
    Comparisons
    3,198
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TippingPoint Digital Vaccine, TippingPoint DV, Trend Micro Digital Vaccine, Trend Micro DV, Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Threats do not discriminate between application delivery vectors, requiring an approach that has full visibility into all application traffic, including SSL encrypted content, with full user context. Threat Prevention leverages the visibility of our next-generation firewall to inspect all traffic, automatically preventing known threats, regardless of port, protocol or SSL encryption.

    Keep ahead of the latest threats and protect your critical data with ongoing threat prevention and analysis.

    Offer
    Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention
    Learn more about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
    Sample Customers
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Yapi Kredi
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Comms Service Provider30%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise15%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is ranked 10th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is ranked 15th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 4 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is rated 9.0, while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention writes "Reliable with good IPS and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System writes "Very stable with good technical support, but can be quite expensive". Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is most compared with Check Point IPS, Darktrace, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Vectra AI, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is most compared with Check Point IPS, Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Cisco NGIPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS and McAfee Network Security Platform. See our Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.