Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 6.3, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Palo Alto Networks holds a 5.1% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 29 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 3,171 Views
  • 2,537 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 16 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 1,376 Views
  • 1,238 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System compete in the cybersecurity market. Palo Alto appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, ease of management, and robust cloud options, despite Trellix's competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Palo Alto Networks offers a next-generation firewall with machine learning for threat detection, WildFire for advanced sandboxing, and strong URL filtering. Trellix focuses on real-time threat intelligence, efficient DDoS attack management, and stable performance supported by automated signature updates.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve its initial setup complexity, resource consumption, and expand protocol integrations. Users also suggest enhancements in email protection and pricing. Trellix's management interface needs simplification, along with better detection capabilities and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer primarily on-premises deployments, with Palo Alto providing more cloud deployment options. Palo Alto generally has better-rated customer support, though some users express concerns about local support quality. Trellix is praised for good support but criticized for complex console navigation and limited support resources in certain regions.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto is perceived as expensive, particularly in smaller markets, but its advanced features justify the cost for many and offer strong ROI due to comprehensive security functionalities. Trellix, offering competitive pricing and no licensing fees, appeals to budget-conscious buyers and provides value through its effectiveness and cost structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 5.1%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention5.1%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System2.9%
Other92.0%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Partha Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Partha Dash
Global Network Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Advanced protection enables us to confidently secure against evolving threats
Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to protect against those types of threats, as AI will be there to do a human job; this is an evolving area. From an Advanced Threat Protection perspective, the technology associated with Palo Alto Networks, such as their sandboxing environment, is quite good. However, Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations. While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions.
Read full review
BS
Bhupesh-Sharma
Large account Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited
Has offered reliable threat protection and detailed network insights but could expand features beyond existing capabilities
The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs). They track and collect data from APTs, which allows them to track malicious files entering the environment. The system offers inline prevention and real-time automatic blocking of malicious packets before they reach the network. It integrates with the Trellix ecosystem and provides application visibility and control. The solution provides deep insight into network traffic, applications, and protocols for better information. All packets coming through the application are analyzed and reported. They share intelligence updates regularly to protect from different malicious files and sector-specific threats. It supports both on-premise and cloud environments.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves."
"Edge protection is a valuable feature."
"My advice to others would be to use Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention for the perimeter of the network."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"It effectively prevents malware, ransomware, and other attacks."
"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."
"After three years, we haven't had any issues or concerns with our environment."
"I like the solution's interface."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
"It works very well overall, and is excellent for enterprise-level businesses."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of custom signatures in IPS."
"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."
"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."
"The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs)."
"We feel safer now."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems."
"The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems."
"There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."
"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."
"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."
"It's not so easy to set up a test environment because it's not so easy to get the test license."
"The initial setup is complex."
"While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
"Currently, the settings and confirmations on the McAfee console are complex and complicated for our branches."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."
"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."
"The deployment was a little difficult, I did it myself."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."
"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
"The pricing could be lower."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"It's not too expensive."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is competitively priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Performing Arts
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to prot...
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for McAfee Network Security Platform?
We do not use Trellix Intrusion Prevention System; rather, we sell the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System solution. The typical use case for our clients is to find out what vulnerable files exist....
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Network Security Platform?
I have experience working with other tools, specifically Trellix solutions such as DLP, EDR, and MDR, as well as with other Imperva tools. My team has worked with Trellix Intrusion Prevention Syste...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 8% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 8% of the time
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 8% of the time
TrendAI Tipping Point vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
TrendAI Tipping Point vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
TrendAI Tipping Point vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
TrendAI Tipping Point vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 15% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 11% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 10% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 8% of the time
IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
March 2026
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
March 2026
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
March 2026
Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.