Aurea CX Messenger vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus comparison

Aurea and TIBCO are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Aurea is ranked #14, while TIBCO is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0. Aurea holds a 0.8% mindshare in E, compared to TIBCO’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Messenger

Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews

784 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews

702 Views
702 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Messenger

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and Aurea CX Messenger are competing products in enterprise integration and messaging solutions. Despite TIBCO's edge in pricing and support, Aurea is often favored for its robust feature set.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus offers comprehensive integration capabilities, easy configuration, and high reliability. Aurea CX Messenger stands out with advanced messaging features, scalability, and cross-platform compatibility, excelling in handling complex messaging scenarios.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus could improve its scalability and offer more detailed documentation for complex configurations. Additionally, enhancing its user interface could streamline user experience. Aurea CX Messenger might benefit from a simplified deployment process, reduced setup costs, and more intuitive configuration tools to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides a straightforward deployment model with comprehensive support, making integration simpler. Aurea CX Messenger offers extensive support resources and detailed documentation, which, while potentially challenging, offer flexibility and detailed assistance.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is seen as cost-effective, delivering a strong ROI and preferred by budget-conscious organizations. Aurea CX Messenger tends to have higher setup costs but promises significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and support for enterprise needs. The choice may hinge on budget constraints and specific scalability requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (12th), SOA Governance (5th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (9th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 4.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Lightweight and efficient solution

It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…

Read full review

Mustofa Yonus

Cheif Specialist- Licensing Systems at Roads & Transport Authority

A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."

"The solution offers excellent stability."

"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."

"The solution is very stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"It's very stable and reliable."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros

Cons

"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."

"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."

"The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors."

"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."

"We'd like to see improvements in product support."

"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"

"The pricing is not so high."

"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Insurance Company

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle SOA Suite vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 26% of the time

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 26% of the time

IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 20% of the time

More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 48% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 28% of the time

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 24% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

August 2025

Download Aurea CX Messenger product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

July 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ

ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

July 2025

Free Report: Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.