No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service vs Pulseway comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (78th)
Pulseway
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (77th), Server Monitoring (28th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Systems Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is designed for IT Infrastructure Monitoring and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Pulseway, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), holds 3.0% mindshare, up 1.5% since last year.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service0.4%
Zabbix4.8%
Nagios XI3.6%
Other91.2%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Pulseway3.0%
NinjaOne9.8%
Kaseya VSA9.7%
Other77.5%
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

Saktid Devi Jeyakaran - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Cloud Engineer at Ebizoncloud LLC
Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database
It's primarily for CPU utilization and resource monitoring. Vulnerability scanning falls under OCI Cloud Guard, so it's related to security concerns. Some people might prefer using a third-party tool for more enhanced features. However, I think Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service could be improved to reduce the need for third-party connectivity. So overall, third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service. OCI needs more research and development to understand why clients choose third-party tools like Splunk or QRadar over internal monitoring solutions. There must be some areas where third-party tools are better. OCI could analyze this and improve its service.
reviewer2132892 - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at Hogan's Systems Consulting, LLC
Great notifications, a wide variety of features, and excellent monitoring capabilities
It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop. It's nice to be able to do things remotely using my phone; however, in many cases, it would be very helpful to be able to do things from a desktop or laptop computer. This would be especially useful for things like remote access to computers. It's too hard to do much on a Windows computer using a tiny phone screen. Being able to do things from a desktop or laptop computer would be much more productive.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."
"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."
"Using this platform has allowed us to reach and assist our remotely based clients, regardless of their location provided they have an internet connection."
"They provide a lot of features; it's good and easy software."
"The solution has great workflow and server modules."
"The setup is simple."
"It has made life a lot easier for the administrators."
"So this solution allows for 24/7 support and is very handy."
 

Cons

"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
"Sometimes the speed is a problem. When I've been remote controlling people, from time to time, there were some issues with people in Hong Kong."
"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."
"GUI needs to be improved and the solution lacks a process for monitoring VOIP calls."
"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."
"Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac endpoints - not having this functionality is a major inconvenience in having to have two systems for clients using this platform."
"There are some bugs or glitches."
"Support needs to be improved because we've sometimes had to wait 24 hours to get a response."
"However, the solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer, so it would be great if that is improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE
Dell, Canon, Siemens, Harvard University, Northwestern University
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, Splunk and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: August 2026.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.