We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Middleware and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server."The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"Data integrity."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"One of the most valuable features is the in-memory database."
"It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool."
"The solution's new UI called Fiori is user friendly."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"The initial setup is not complex; it's more at a medium level. Not too easy, but with the right knowledge, you can configure it."
"A user-friendly UI with good documentation."
"It is a very scalable solution. We have enterprise-level businesses using this solution."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"One thing that I would like to see is if this product can be containerized. We are moving away from virtual servers and moving more towards containerization to be able to quickly set up environments or have the flexibility of scaling them. It would be good if it can be containerized, and it works well in containerized platforms."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"The price could always be better."
"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."
"The product should improve BPEL features."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"Lacks ability to easily mass upload which has become a necessity for industry."
"In an upcoming release of SAP S4HANA, chain management should be easier."
"The theory-side of the solution needs to be improved."
"There should be an easier way to migrate customers from all versions to SAP S/4HANA."
"In an upcoming release, it would be beneficial to have more practical intelligence in the system, such as protective maintenance, or artificial intelligence."
"This is a costly solution."
"An area for improvement would be integration with different kinds of legacies. In the next release, I would like the product to be prepared for blockchain technology and the best way to communicate with social networking."
"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."
Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and JBoss, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi Wanlaya, We are SAP consulting company based in Mumbai, India you can visit our website www.inteliwaves.com.
Just to answer your question please find herewith document i have may be helpful to you and will help you in your decision making process.
In the most recent rankings of the top ERP systems, it’s not surprising that both solutions did well. S/4HANA ranked #6 and Oracle ERP Cloud landed at #3, although they both finished in the top two in terms of market share. While some might argue they should have finished higher in our rankings, below are some independent analysis of how these two leading industry titans compare to one another.