We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle Fusion Middleware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is great."
"The solution's support is very good for repairing components."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"The solution has flexibility and stability."
"JBoss is a scalable tool."
"The most valuable thing about JBoss is how easy it is to install and manage it on-premise, making the process simple."
"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers."
"The most valuable feature is the UI."
"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"The solution's documentation could be better."
"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."
"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."
"In terms of monitoring, the old version was somewhat limited in flexibility, lacking the ability to easily adjust configurations."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
"The product should improve BPEL features."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 23 reviews while Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and Fujitsu Interstage Application Server, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and TIBCO ActiveMatrix. See our JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
