We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Sauce Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."
"It offers a wide range of testing."
"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."
"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"On a scale of one to ten, I would give OpenText UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis."
"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."
"It is very simple to use, and the scripting language is even easier."
"Sauce Lab analytics helped us to get detailed knowledge on test cases execution and logs."
"The custom capabilities that can be provided to Sauce Labs VMs during automated testing sessions are a valuable option for experimental or niche testing."
"Sauce Connect gave us ability to test an application that was hosted locally."
"Easy to integrate with the other platform for tracking purposes."
"They offer a large number of devices and browser/operating system combinations for real device tests"
"I have found the live test section with Sauce Labs to be extremely valuable. When you can't quite figure out why a test is failing, you can go to the live test results section within their tool and launch your test (specifying a given OS/browser, or device) manually and step through the test to see the issue more clearly, usually opening up the developer's tool console and watching the network calls and console (within Chrome) to usually find the underlying issue."
"Allows us to do JIRA Cloud and BambooHR Integration."
"The insights section provides a great overall state of the automation suite and can identify trends relatively quickly. If we see a dip in our passing rate over time, we can look at what changed when the test started failing to find the root cause rather than doing a quick fix to find that the test fails a short time later."
"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."
"They should include AI-based testing features."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation)."
"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."
"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."
"The solution does not have proper scripting."
"The pricing model of Sauce Labs could be more flexible. Sauce Labs has just one price for the type of solution and a set number of devices. Other solutions have a fee for the base solution and an additional cost per device. If you're a smaller organization, you have to consider your needs. Some smaller companies still need to test various devices, so my advice is to start small and scale up as needed. We had initially planned to start big, but that would have been a big waste."
"Better and programmatic controls on request/response recordings and sharing with developers."
"The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging."
"Multi-domain SSO is a big concern for us right now, especially as we've been merged into a larger company. I suddenly have teams coming from 20 different domains, and because the main master Sauce Labs account is locked down to one SSO domain, there are teams that can't run a test right now. I've heard they're working on a solution and they've been very communicative with us about it. A solution to that would help us a lot."
"Sauce Labs' dashboard could be improved by adding more filters and allowing more customization options. There was one instance where the dashboard on the Sauce Labs UI didn't meet our requirements, so we had to use the Sauce Labs API to create some apps and dashboards on our own. The API endpoints could be a little more robust and customizable."
"Integration with Github, as well as several other similar tools, could be improved."
"We encountered minor issues with stability from time to time but Sauce Labs continues to make improvements."
"I would like for there to be more detail in regards to the quality of our code i.e. how many failures occurred, how many passed based on industry standard metrics, etc."
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews while Sauce Labs is ranked 13th in Test Automation Tools with 112 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Sauce Labs is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Robust documentation, helpful support representative, good licensing model". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, LambdaTest, Katalon Studio and Bitbar.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
