Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Functional Testing compete in the software testing category. Parasoft SOAtest has an advantage due to its diverse protocol and scripting language support and API testing strength.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest emphasizes comprehensive API testing, data-driven testing support, and modular scenario setup. It also offers service virtualization and custom scripting capabilities. OpenText Functional Testing is developer-focused, allowing tests with Java and C# and integrating well into developer environments.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from a more modern UI and improved performance on large datasets. Users also desire better integration with more tools and protocols. OpenText Functional Testing users cite the need for better stability, broader technology support, and improved CI/CD pipeline integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is mainly an on-premises solution, with limited hybrid cloud options. Its customer service receives positive reviews, though technical support experiences vary. OpenText Functional Testing supports broader deployment options, including public cloud, and is praised for its structured support and quick responses.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered costly but justified by its feature set, offering high ROI by reducing manual testing efforts. Its licensing is complex. OpenText Functional Testing is also pricey but provides robust features and integration, delivering strong ROI in complex environments.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Parasoft SOAtest | 1.7% |
| Other | 95.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
