OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #27. OpenText holds a 5.8% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

5,425 Views
5,045 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Tricentis LiveCompare

Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review

921 Views
507 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Tricentis LiveCompare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Tricentis LiveCompare and OpenText Software Delivery Management are competing products enhancing software delivery. Tricentis LiveCompare holds an advantage due to its customer satisfaction, while OpenText Software Delivery Management is favored for advanced features.

Features: Tricentis LiveCompare provides impact analysis, risk-based testing, and integration with various testing tools. OpenText Software Delivery Management is notable for delivery and deployment capabilities and offers real-time analytics. OpenText's broad features suit complex enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis LiveCompare ensures user-friendly deployment and reliable customer service focused on quick issue resolution. OpenText Software Delivery Management has a more complex deployment, supporting large-scale operations with extensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis LiveCompare is known for cost-effectiveness with lower initial setup costs and promising ROI. OpenText Software Delivery Management, though more costly upfront, justifies its price with superior functionality and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Tricentis LiveCompare

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

27th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.8%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management	5.8%
Tricentis LiveCompare	0.9%
Other	93.3%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

Generating audit evidence effortlessly saves time and money

OpenText ALM Octane is a new product with full development ongoing, where new ideas are launched regularly. Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes. This efficiency is especially valuable for audits required by financial regulators.

Read full review

it_user713811

Product Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade

The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It’s easy to set up."

"An improvement on previous versions because it comes as preconfigured as possible."

"We like Micro Focus ALM Octane because its performance is okay, and its stability is okay, so we use it a lot. The platform is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the test lab; for example, we use it for both mobile testing and browser testing, and the interface is user-friendly."

"Micro Focus' technical support is good."

"There are a lot of predefined reports. We can attach additional reports for users, like who worked on what defect and when, as well as what is the status of the release compared to the previous release. It is really endless. All the data is really linked together. Then, if all the data is linked together, there is an option to prepare reports out of it. We are very impressed with its reporting capabilities."

"Octane has reduced manual testing time in our organization."

"I like the fact that you can use it on top of Jira."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."

"Using LiveCompare allows us to automate many of the required tasks while gaining access to data needed to optimize our SAP environments with fewer resources than before."

"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."

Cons

"There is no question that everything can improve."

"Octane, from an administration perspective, is very limited."

"The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high."

"There's a trend in our requests to have the ability to export data, en masse, out of Octane. There are capabilities within Octane to export data, but there are specifics around test suites and requirements and relations, as well as certain attributes, that we would like to be able to export easily out of Octane and into a database or Excel."

"Also, while there is a Requirements Module in Octane, it is very plain. It's okay to have some requirements described there, but it's not really following the whole BDD approach. I would like to have more features for requirements in there."

"From my personal point of view, what could be improved in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its integration with Jira."

"I have yet to experience the CI/CD part of Micro Focus ALM Octane but as demonstrated by the team who is providing the services, I see that the CI/CD could improve. When we check in the code, for the code snippet that has been checked in by a particular user, you need to open a separate file. When comparing Micro Focus ALM Octane to Jira, they have a separate window in which you can click on the ID and the code is visible in the snippet. It's a two-step process in Micro Focus ALM Octane and it's a single-step process in Jira. It's essential for the developers to think about this difference."

"The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight on a scale from one to ten, where ten is very expensive."

"There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."

"The price of Micro Focus ALM Octane is too high compared to other solutions."

"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses."

"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."

"It will be as expensive as ALM.NET, if not more expensive. But here's a good tip: If you have ALM.NET, you are able to share your licenses from ALM.NET to Octane. You just have to define a dedicated number of licenses on ALM.NET and then you can share them with ALM Octane, with some configuration effort. This is something that you have to take into account, that there is a possibility of such license sharing that could decrease your costs. Compared to open-source tools, the price the ALM Octane is definitely higher, in terms of the licensing cost."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 6% of the time

Polarion ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 20% of the time

Jira vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 17% of the time

SmartShift vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 12% of the time

Avantra vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 12% of the time

PWC SAP Services vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 5% of the time

More Tricentis LiveCompare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2026

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

June 2026

Download Tricentis LiveCompare product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

No data available

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Tricentis LiveCompare provides advanced analytics and smart automation, enhancing testing efficiency and accuracy for SAP landscapes.

Designed for complex environments, Tricentis LiveCompare specializes in impact analysis, offering real-time insights that minimize risks and enhance decision-making processes in SAP system updates and changes. Its intelligent analytics help identify and prioritize critical test cases, reducing unnecessary tests.

What are the most valuable features of Tricentis LiveCompare?

Impact Analysis: Identifies changed elements to focus on critical areas.
Test Optimization: Reduces test volumes while maintaining quality.
Smart Analytics: Provides actionable insights for informed decisions.
Automation Integration: Seamlessly supports continuous testing frameworks.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Tricentis LiveCompare?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with targeted approaches.
Time Savings: Accelerates test cycles through optimized processes.
Risk Reduction: Decreases deployment risks with precise impact assessments.
Quality Assurance: Enhances product quality with thorough testing insights.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries such as finance and retail where maintaining high system reliability during updates is crucial. Its analytical capabilities support robust testing processes, ensuring operational stability and efficiency across complex SAP systems.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.