OpenText ProVision vs Oracle BPM comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #51, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

498 Views
274 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,370 Views
1,343 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Oracle BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and OpenText ProVision are both prominent contenders in the business process management domain. Oracle BPM is often seen as more robust due to its extensive features and scalability, while OpenText ProVision stands out for detailed architecture modeling.

Features: Oracle BPM includes process modeling, simulation, and execution, tailored for large enterprise needs. It also offers extensive integration options. OpenText ProVision is distinguished by its advanced architecture modeling and visualization capabilities, catering to organizations focused on enterprise architecture. Its strong modeling strengths are a significant advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM is recognized for its hybrid deployment options and strong enterprise support, which facilitate smooth integration and implementation. Its customer service is often highlighted for its responsiveness. OpenText ProVision provides a flexible deployment model with strong architectural support, although it may require more specialized knowledge for setup. It delivers comprehensive support tailored to architectural solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM typically has higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features aimed at larger enterprises, offering significant ROI through improved process efficiencies. OpenText ProVision presents a more cost-effective setup for those emphasizing architecture modeling, with ROI achieved through enhanced understanding and optimization of business processes. Oracle BPM tends to provide greater long-term value in enterprise settings, while OpenText ProVision excels in organizations focused on architecture-centric process improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

51st

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (27th)

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle BPM	1.9%
OpenText ProVision	0.4%
Other	97.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies

Helpful tool for business process management integration and a straightforward setup

Oracle BPM is used as a tool integrated into another system. It helps in business process management and the generation of reports, predominantly at the end of the month For any new deployment of any system, it helps in improving some efficiencies, which is the reason for having the system. It…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."

"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."

"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."

"The solution provides extensive functionalities."

"It is quite scalable and can be applied to enterprise-level organizations effectively."

More Oracle BPM pros

Cons

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."

"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."

"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."

"The solution's licensing cost is very high."

"The product must reduce its cost."

"Oracle BPM should allow integration with external, common APIs."

"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."

"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."

More Oracle BPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is very expensive."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

"The licensing model is good."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

20%

Construction Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Wireless Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 52% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 48% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Oracle BPM

Compared 25% of the time

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 19% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 14% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

September 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Also Known As

Metastorm ProVision

Oracle Business Process Management

Overview

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ProVision vs. Oracle BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.