No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs SoftLogica WAPT Pro comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Professional Perfo...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (3rd), Load Testing Tools (3rd)
SoftLogica WAPT Pro
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (75th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) and SoftLogica WAPT Pro aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 12.8%, down 13.0% compared to last year.
SoftLogica WAPT Pro, on the other hand, focuses on AWS Marketplace, holds 0.3% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.8%
Apache JMeter11.2%
Tricentis NeoLoad10.7%
Other65.3%
Performance Testing Tools
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SoftLogica WAPT Pro0.3%
HZWTech Device Studio0.5%
WaitTime Gate Queue0.5%
Other98.7%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

SD
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy
Experience a decade of seamless performance with robust support
I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see the same features that people generally prefer. I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps.
Use SoftLogica WAPT Pro?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user104961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees
Apr 13, 2014
LoadRunner vs NeoLoad
The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Construction Company
57%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise66
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?
When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?
I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner
WAPT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.
886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.