Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Digital Asset Management vs Pimcore comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Digital Asset Mana...
Ranking in Digital Asset Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pimcore
Ranking in Digital Asset Management
20th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (11th), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (13th), Customer Data Platforms (CDP) (30th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Digital Asset Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Digital Asset Management is 5.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pimcore is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Digital Asset Management5.8%
Pimcore2.6%
Other91.6%
Digital Asset Management
 

Featured Reviews

YasserAli - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Presales Consultant at Merkle
This provides all-in-one media management for images and videos
The solution is not very user friendly, and if you're coming from a conventional enterprise content management background, there is a steep learning curve. I think it should make itself more discoverable to technical people and that includes the documentation which is lacking in terms of ease of use. I'd like to see some right to left languages as an additional feature. We have to integrate with third parties in order for Arabic to be recognized. It would make a big difference to have that included. It's something that a lot of the competitors are doing. OpenText is lagging in that regard. We're based in Egypt and unfortunately we're unable to implement the full functionality of the solution and get the best out of the product.
reviewer2296077 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The solution is easy to use, but the UI and UX must be improved
We implemented a project in the last eight months. We use the product for data transformation and e-commerce The solution is easy to use. The UI and UX must be improved. Automated data handling must be improved. I have been using the solution for six years. I am using the latest version of the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is an all-in-one media solution in terms of media management."
"The solution is easy to use."
 

Cons

"Could be more user-friendly."
"The UI and UX must be improved."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Marks & Spencer, Minneapolis Institute of Art, Argos, News UK, Rosetta Stone, Tarkett, DDR Corp., PBS
Deutsche Bahn AG, Burger King, Intersport, Bösch, BuildDirect, Gogo, Ikea, GANT, Peugeot Motorcycles, Heidelberg, NextJet, Antonio Viani Importe GmbH, Deutsche Bahn AG, T-Mobile
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Cloudinary, Aprimo and others in Digital Asset Management. Updated: February 2026.
883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.