OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

OpenText and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8, while SonicWall is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 10 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,582 Views
774 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

The products OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and SonicWall Capture Client compete in the computer security category. OpenText has the upper hand due to its efficient deployment, low system impact, and affordability.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a powerful cloud console, fast scanning, and low overhead. Its AI functionality is highly valued, alongside minimal system impact. SonicWall Capture Client is recognized for its rollback feature, integration with SentinelOne, and Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection, providing robust threat protection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users express a need for better reporting, enhanced upgrade control, and fewer false positives, along with improved threat analysis. SonicWall faces issues with performance impact such as memory consumption and network latency. It requires better vulnerability reporting and a modern user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection can be easily deployed across cloud environments. However, its customer service receives mixed feedback. SonicWall Capture Client, while resource-heavy, has positive customer service reviews, often being described as consistently good.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is seen as cost-effective with transparent pricing and flexible subscriptions. It delivers positive ROI due to competitive pricing. SonicWall’s cost varies by region, and its pricing fairness receives mixed reviews. OpenText’s affordability and value offer a stronger ROI narrative.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Jasmit Singh Juneja

CEO & Technology Specialist at Karman Infotech Private Limited

A stable solution that is used for endpoint security and to protect computers from malware

We are using the latest version of SonicWall Capture Client. Fortinet is ahead of SonicWall. The range of appliances, equipment, availability in my country with the distributors, and the overall ecosystem of Fortinet is way better than SonicWall. My advice to others looking into using SonicWall Capture Client is to keep giving feedback to the companies regarding whatever improvements should be made. Overall, I rate SonicWall Capture Client an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"Low performance requirements."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"It is very light. It is the only solution that can be installed on a machine that already has an antivirus. It is a pretty complete solution."

"Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight."

"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"Reporting system could be improved."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"The implementation is not easy."

"XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."

"They should improve their user interface."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Work on a price tier plan."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"The pricing is high."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 19% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 19% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

May 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

No data available

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.