OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Zabbix comparison

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 109 Zabbix reviews

36,835 Views
9,209 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Zabbix are both strong competitors in business process monitoring. Based on various comparisons, Zabbix appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and cost efficiency.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Zabbix?

OpenText offers strong integration capabilities, comprehensive monitoring features, and robust tools to manage business processes. Zabbix offers extensive customization options, powerful data gathering features, and flexibility and advanced functionality.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Zabbix?

OpenText could improve its scalability, operational workflows, and intuitive user interface. Zabbix should enhance its setup process, documentation, and user-friendliness.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Zabbix?

OpenText is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Zabbix offers deployment flexibility but has mixed reviews on customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to Zabbix?

OpenText typically involves higher setup costs but provides good ROI with its extensive capabilities. Zabbix offers a more cost-effective solution and delivers high ROI with lower upfront costs, especially valued in budget-conscious environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: September 2026).

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Zabbix

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

43rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.2%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	2.2%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.6%
Other	97.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"Ability to monitor multiple application protocols."

"The solution is very good at showing users ways to use a user action on a website and to see the performance."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"What I find most valuable is that it has synthetic monitoring that you can run from different geographies and identify, as it’s more proactive monitoring than reactive monitoring, so it'll alert customers before they find out things are not working, and proactive monitoring is very helpful to most of our customers."

"Product allows business analysts to create the application with very little software development time needed."

"When you learn how to work with it, you will love it."

"The most valuable feature is service assurance."

"We detect problems before the customer does and before it actually happens using the predictive functions in Zabbix."

"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."

"The monitoring capabilities of the product are excellent."

"It is a very good product, and it is for a good reason that we have chosen Zabbix as part of our monitoring portfolio."

"The most valuable features in Zabbix are those that help us overcome bottlenecks in CPU usage, as well as reduce memory delay. I know that we have only reached the tip of the iceberg of what Zabbix's features can do for us, and we have not used all of them yet."

"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"Customer support is pretty average and can use some improvement."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"Support has experienced high turnover recently due to HP acqusition of the former Mercury Interactive product."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The product has been discontinued."

"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."

"The documentation could be improved."

"I really do not like this solution, almost all of its features are awful."

"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."

"In an upcoming release, there should be automated reports which we are currently doing manually. For example, if we collect a report file every day and want to send it to a moderator for review. We are expecting this feature to come out soon but it would be valuable to have now."

"In the next release, I'm hoping for features targeted towards larger users with more customizable options. Despite this, I think pre-canned reports that can be used straight out of the box would be beneficial rather than having to configure each report individually. Additionally, a deeper dive into software configurations on the machines would be useful, although I understand there may be challenges in implementing this due to scripting requirements. More documentation would also be appreciated."

"The server monitoring could be better."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"If you have 20,000 hosts, the support costs around €95,000 for a year."

"We’re using the free version, which covers all our current needs."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"It is free, which allows us to reduce costs."

"There are no licenses."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"The solution is free. However, many open-sourced tools start out free but eventually start charging."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I am using only Area Operations, but I don't prefer it. I installed Zabbix for the 3000 devices. Area Operations is not good.

What is your primary use case for Zabbix?

I am still working with VMware and Area Operations, but I installed Zabbix now. I think Zabbix is better than VMware Area Operations. It's really good. I'm working with both Zabbix and VMware now.

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Download Zabbix product report

August 2026

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring provides advanced capabilities in anomaly detection, proactive analysis, and alerts, enhancing monitoring proficiency with an easy-to-use interface supporting multiple application protocols.

Supporting organizations in identifying potential issues, OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers compelling functionality for monitoring applications through synthetic monitoring across geographies. Its strategic utility extends to asset management in large ERP systems, focusing on complex transactions, real user experience modeling, and change management. Easy implementation is bolstered by advantageous licensing deals and limited development time, helping business analysts create applications swiftly. Stability and scalability add significant value, although improvement is needed in support response times post-HP acquisition, protocol support challenges, and documentation clarity. Concerns revolve around real-time analytics, tool integration, and enhanced monitoring configurations.

What are key features?

Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregularities to prevent issues before they impact performance.
Proactive Analysis: Assesses potential risks for preemptive action.
Automatic Alerts: Provides instant notifications on critical developments.
Synthetic Monitoring: Enables proactive alerts and performance assessment from multiple geographies.
Multiple Protocol Monitoring: Offers versatility in overseeing diverse application ecosystems.

What benefits should be expected in reviews?

Quick ROI: Fast returns on investment through robust monitoring features.
Easy Interface: User-friendly design reducing complexity in navigation.
Enhanced Scalability: Adaptable monitoring capabilities supporting expanding infrastructures.
Minimal Development Time: Rapid application creation with familiar scripting tools.
Advantageous Licensing: Cost-effective options leveraging existing tools and technologies.

Organizations leverage OpenText Business Process Monitoring to maintain the performance of both public and internal applications, predicting and preparing for maintenance needs. It serves critical roles in strategic change, complex transaction monitoring, and ERP workflow development across various industries, ensuring consistency and effective management of change.

OpenText

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba