Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center are two prominent software testing tools offering solutions for quality assurance and management. OpenText ALM / Quality Center holds the upper hand due to its extensive features, making it worth the higher price tag.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional has integration capabilities with various development tools, robust performance in managing test cases and suites, and support for collaborative testing. OpenText ALM / Quality Center offers advanced test automation features, risk management integrations, and extensive customization options. Users perceive OpenText ALM / Quality Center as offering a richer set of features.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could improve its reporting capabilities, integration with non-Microsoft tools, and user interface. OpenText ALM / Quality Center could benefit from a more modern interface, enhanced workflow customization, and simpler licensing model.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a more complex deployment process but benefits from robust customer service that assists with complexities.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional attracts users with its competitive pricing and favorable ROI. OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a higher initial setup cost, but users find the investment justified by its extensive features and reliable performance.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The price is expensive.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
