OpenIAM Access Manager vs PingAccess comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenIAM Logo
282 views|222 comparisons
Ping Identity Logo
273 views|200 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenIAM Access Manager and PingAccess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Access Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use OpenIAM Access Manager?
Doctor Ngobeni
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution is highly stable and scalable
Top Answer:The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning.
Top Answer:PingAccess is used for managing access, URL management, and website management.
Ranking
21st
out of 37 in Access Management
Views
282
Comparisons
222
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 37 in Access Management
Views
273
Comparisons
200
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
201
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Learn More
OpenIAM
Video Not Available
Overview

The Web Access Manager is an integral part of the OpenIAM platform. The Access Manager provides a scalable, secure and consistent solution to access applications in hybrid environments for both corporate (employees) and consumers (external) alike.

The Access Manager provides organizations with the following tools to enable these objectives:

Web SSO with support for SAML 2, oAuth 2, OIDC, and a rProxy to allow SSO to legacy applications
Adaptive Authentication
Multifactor Authentication (MFA)
Social Sign-on
Authorization
Session Management
Device registration
Fine grained audit logging

PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine. It provides secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL level, and ensures that only authorized users access the resources they need.

Sample Customers
Electric Insurance Company, Rochester Regional Health Information Organization, Banco de Portugal, Tata Communications, TUI Hotels
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company9%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm54%
Transportation Company8%
Insurance Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise91%
Buyer's Guide
Access Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenIAM Access Manager is ranked 21st in Access Management while PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review. OpenIAM Access Manager is rated 0.0, while PingAccess is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". OpenIAM Access Manager is most compared with Gluu, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas PingAccess is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and ForgeRock.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.