OneStream XF vs SAP Business Planning and Consolidation comparison

"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking."

"With OneStream, it is a little different; it is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything; users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup."

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."

"Up to the implementation of the application, it used to take weeks to the consolidation team to carry out the entire, monthly, financial consolidation, now it takes them just one or two days to perform the entire process."

"There are longstanding challenges with OneStream XF, particularly around the technical aspects that require scripting skills, typically managed by finance departments."

"It's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it."

"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser."

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

"There are no tutorials or wizards inside the tool, and I think they would be very useful sometimes."

"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."

"The licensing is expensive."

"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."