One Identity Safeguard vs senhasegura SaaS comparison

"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless."

"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."

"I like that One Identity Safeguard lets you configure the maximum number of connections to the target, a configuration I didn't find in its competitor."

"All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI."

"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."

"We have not had any issues with the core product itself, but there is an add-on called SCALUS, which is quite critical to the user experience, and that does not work. They have been having issues with that for quite a long time, like months. That is not great at all."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

"Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."

"We are still in the onboarding phase, and it seems very manual. Ideally, a single interface to integrate all these processes would be useful."

"The tool has to improve its interface and make the product more user-friendly."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Compared to CyberArk, the tool is very cheap."