One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #17. One Identity holds a 2.3% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 88 One Identity Safeguard reviews

9,254 Views
1,758 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

1,234 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

17th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.3%
Securonix UEBA	2.7%
Other	95.0%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of One Identity Safeguard was simple."

"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."

"One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility."

"The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated."

"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"Over four years of use, we have not encountered a single system crash or failure, and the product is stable."

"The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is perfect, scoring ten out of ten."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"ROI is evident. The ROI is there from cost optimization and everything else."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

Cons

"I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved."

"I rated One Identity Safeguard nine out of 10 because the stability and control could be better, as there are some problems with stability and errors when we use it."

"While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability."

"One Identity Safeguard can be improved by making the user interface more intuitive and easier to navigate, especially for new users who may find the initial experience slightly complex."

"The integration part seems a bit challenging because some tools cannot be integrated properly with it."

"Overall, One Identity Safeguard works well, but it could be improved in terms of UI simplicity and ease of navigation, especially for new users."

"Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support."

"The GUI has room for improvement because it is confusing and cumbersome."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

University

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	89
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	36

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are managed by the management team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is a very strong privileged access management solution, and the only thing that needs to be enhanced is its dashboard customization; apart from this, everything is perfect.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is used primarily to secure privileged credentials, enforce control over administrative access, and provide visibility into privileged activities. Whenever a network or serve...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 14% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 4% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 13% of the time

ArcSight Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 9% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

July 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

June 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix UEBA delivers powerful user behavior analytics with intuitive dashboards and advanced threat detection algorithms.

Securonix UEBA aggregates diverse use case data into organized dashboards, visualizing trends and enabling cross-organization comparisons. Advanced algorithms detect insider threats and anomalies, ensuring comprehensive user activity visibility. Continuous enhancements through new policies and custom rules support thorough monitoring and investigation, while cyber analytics algorithms differentiate it in the market. Improvements are needed in algorithm enhancement, integration with EDRs and packages, and reporting emphasis.

What are the key features of Securonix UEBA?

Comprehensive Aggregation Library: Covers various use cases with ease.
Intuitive Dashboards: Organized for clear data visualization.
Advanced Algorithms: Detect insider threats accurately.
AI-Based Behavior Analytics: Full visibility into user activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Supports tailored monitoring and investigation.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Securonix UEBA?

Insider Threat Detection: Identify threats efficiently.
User Activity Monitoring: Continuous insights into user behavior.
Behavior Analysis: Differentiates normal from suspicious patterns.
Comprehensive Threat Notifications: Delivers timely alerts.

Organizations use Securonix UEBA in insider threat detection and behavior analysis, assisting in lateral movement, ransomware, and malware detection. It's used for network traffic observation in scenarios such as data exportation by contractors or abnormal account access, typically in appliance-based setups within data centers, offering thorough user threat notifications and behavior analysis tailored to industry needs.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

June 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.