Safeguard by One Identity vs Securonix UEBA comparison

Why PeerSpot?

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #15. One Identity holds a 2.8% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 90 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,011 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

1,557 Views
1,417 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA provide advanced security solutions in distinct areas, with Securonix UEBA offering a superior feature set for innovative analytics and One Identity Safeguard providing cost-effective options that are appealing to budget-focused decision-makers.

Features:One Identity Safeguard is known for its strong privileged access management, user-friendly management interface, and detailed auditing capabilities. Securonix UEBA stands out with behavioral analytics, AI-driven insights, and robust threat detection tools, making it attractive for managing complex security threats.

Room for Improvement:One Identity Safeguard could benefit from refining its feature set for more complex threat scenarios and expanding its behavioral analytics capabilities. Securonix UEBA might enhance ease of use and offer more streamlined deployment processes, reducing its initial learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:One Identity Safeguard integrates easily with existing IT structures, offering responsive customer support and shorter implementation times. Securonix UEBA, while scalable, requires more configuration and training to maximize its functionality, but it is adaptable to diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI:One Identity Safeguard provides transparent pricing with competitive structures, facilitating a predictable ROI. Securonix UEBA, although higher in cost, justifies its price with a comprehensive analytical toolkit, offering potential long-term benefits for those prioritizing comprehensive threat intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

15th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	2.8%
Securonix UEBA	2.6%
Other	94.6%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer Service: absolutely perfect Technical Support: Technical support is 10/10, absolutely."

"One of the biggest positive impacts of One Identity Safeguard on my organization is the improved control over privileged access; before implementing it, managing administrative credentials and tracking privileged activity required more manual effort, and after implementation, access became more structured and we had better visibility into who was accessing critical systems and when, which helped strengthen our security posture and made audit-related activities easier to manage."

"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."

"We are very pleased with the Safeguard platform feature."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."

"It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with."

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best."

"ROI is evident. The ROI is there from cost optimization and everything else."

Cons

"One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled."

"While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability."

"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."

"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."

"Many team members feel that the biggest friction with One Identity Safeguard relates to access requests, session approvals, and policy changes, which require more clicks than expected."

"It is a good solution, but it needs more marketing."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Our experience with the pricing and licensing was generally positive. The initial setup costs were reasonable considering the security and access control benefits we are getting. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

I think Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the user interface a little simpler and more intuitive, especially for new administrators. Some configurations and advanced features ta...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is to manage a secure privileged account and access a critical system. It helps us to control who can access sensitive resources and monitor privilege...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Haystax Analytics Platform vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 14% of the time

ArcSight Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

August 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

August 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix UEBA delivers powerful user behavior analytics with intuitive dashboards and advanced threat detection algorithms.

Securonix UEBA aggregates diverse use case data into organized dashboards, visualizing trends and enabling cross-organization comparisons. Advanced algorithms detect insider threats and anomalies, ensuring comprehensive user activity visibility. Continuous enhancements through new policies and custom rules support thorough monitoring and investigation, while cyber analytics algorithms differentiate it in the market. Improvements are needed in algorithm enhancement, integration with EDRs and packages, and reporting emphasis.

What are the key features of Securonix UEBA?

Comprehensive Aggregation Library: Covers various use cases with ease.
Intuitive Dashboards: Organized for clear data visualization.
Advanced Algorithms: Detect insider threats accurately.
AI-Based Behavior Analytics: Full visibility into user activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Supports tailored monitoring and investigation.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Securonix UEBA?

Insider Threat Detection: Identify threats efficiently.
User Activity Monitoring: Continuous insights into user behavior.
Behavior Analysis: Differentiates normal from suspicious patterns.
Comprehensive Threat Notifications: Delivers timely alerts.

Organizations use Securonix UEBA in insider threat detection and behavior analysis, assisting in lateral movement, ransomware, and malware detection. It's used for network traffic observation in scenarios such as data exportation by contractors or abnormal account access, typically in appliance-based setups within data centers, offering thorough user threat notifications and behavior analysis tailored to industry needs.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

September 2026

Free Report: Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.