One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #16. One Identity holds a 2.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 54 One Identity Safeguard reviews

5,477 Views
767 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

755 Views
649 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,012 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

16th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 3.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.2%
Securonix UEBA	3.3%
Other	94.5%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Aryan Priyanish D.

Developer Intern at Stealth

Privileged access has been secured while real-time monitoring simplifies credential control

In my opinion, the strongest features of One Identity Safeguard are session monitoring, real-time session control, and the privileged password vault. The password vault has been a game changer because it provides a secure and controlled way to store, manage, and rotate sensitive credentials without exposing them to users. Session monitoring allows us to track and record privileged user activity in real time, which improves visibility and accountability. Overall, One Identity Safeguard has had a positive impact on our organization by strengthening security through centralized privileged access control and improving efficiency through automation. Real-time session monitoring has further enhanced oversight and reduced risk.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

"There are a lot of features, so it's going to sound funny, but one of the most simplistic features, the Favorites feature, is the one we like the best. You do a full run-through of configuration to check out a server and then you can save that whole configuration as a favorite. So the next time you go in, you click on the favorite that you configured and it automatically takes you to the end so you can check the server out that much faster. It saves a lot of time..."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"From my experience, the features are best for monitoring and the usage of LDAP and SSH."

"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."

"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."

"It is generally easy-to-use and install."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

Cons

"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"I find it complicated to implement HTTPS monitoring because the documentation is unclear."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade solution, so the license is not the cheapest in the market, but it reflects the value and security capabilities provided. Initial deploym...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface and navigation can be improved. Some workflows, particularly the reporting, session review, and policy configuration could be more intuitive. New users often need time to get com...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to specifically secure, control, and monitor the privileged accounts across our critical systems. We use this to secure password vaulting for privileg...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 19% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Password Safe vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 21% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

February 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

February 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.