One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #16. One Identity holds a 2.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 54 One Identity Safeguard reviews

5,477 Views
767 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

755 Views
649 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,108 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

16th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 3.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.2%
Securonix UEBA	3.3%
Other	94.5%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Aryan Priyanish D.

Developer Intern at Stealth

Privileged access has been secured while real-time monitoring simplifies credential control

In my opinion, the strongest features of One Identity Safeguard are session monitoring, real-time session control, and the privileged password vault. The password vault has been a game changer because it provides a secure and controlled way to store, manage, and rotate sensitive credentials without exposing them to users. Session monitoring allows us to track and record privileged user activity in real time, which improves visibility and accountability. Overall, One Identity Safeguard has had a positive impact on our organization by strengthening security through centralized privileged access control and improving efficiency through automation. Real-time session monitoring has further enhanced oversight and reduced risk.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The first feature I like about One Identity Safeguard is the live contact point for the VPNs. This has been working very well for us, as it's both highly available and reliable."

"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."

"We have removed shared admin credentials, enforced just-in-time access management, simplified audits with session recording, and reduced manual access work, all thanks to One Identity Safeguard."

"The best feature One Identity Safeguard offers is that it is a pretty new, modern tool that makes extensive use of its API."

"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."

"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."

"It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

Cons

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"Support for One Identity Safeguard could be improved because sometimes the support team doesn't have an answer or solution for some bugs. A feature I found in a competitor would make One Identity Safeguard better, and that is the ability to load balance the traffic in the target."

"I find it complicated to implement HTTPS monitoring because the documentation is unclear."

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

"It needs more marketing."

"They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on."

"The main point regarding the user experience is that Safeguard has two separate management consoles."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade solution, so the license is not the cheapest in the market, but it reflects the value and security capabilities provided. Initial deploym...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface and navigation can be improved. Some workflows, particularly the reporting, session review, and policy configuration could be more intuitive. New users often need time to get com...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to specifically secure, control, and monitor the privileged accounts across our critical systems. We use this to secure password vaulting for privileg...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 19% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Password Safe vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 21% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

February 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

February 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.