One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #17. One Identity holds a 2.1% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 71 One Identity Safeguard reviews

6,465 Views
905 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

838 Views
721 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 891,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

17th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 3.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.1%
Securonix UEBA	3.0%
Other	94.9%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is the life of our customers because it brings a lot of security."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"One Identity Safeguard has a noticeable positive impact around security and operational efficiency, providing secure, strong security, real-time monitoring, and full visibility."

"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by providing strong security, compliance, and the data required for audits, making it really helpful."

"The customer service and technical support are very good."

"Technical support is brilliant."

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA; it's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"ROI is evident. The ROI is there from cost optimization and everything else."

Cons

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the launch module."

"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."

"We should be able to create customized connectors in a better way. For ad hoc or special use cases, I sometimes find we have limitations. Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"One Identity Safeguard could be improved by simplifying the user interface and initial configuration process, especially for first-time users."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

891,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

I did not face any challenges with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, but for improved features, I need to address licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful. If One Identity improves integration durin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard in day-to-day work is to provide identity across all user accounts and domains, and it improves security across the enterprise by providing enhanced feat...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 17% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 13% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 11% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix UEBA delivers powerful user behavior analytics with intuitive dashboards and advanced threat detection algorithms.

Securonix UEBA aggregates diverse use case data into organized dashboards, visualizing trends and enabling cross-organization comparisons. Advanced algorithms detect insider threats and anomalies, ensuring comprehensive user activity visibility. Continuous enhancements through new policies and custom rules support thorough monitoring and investigation, while cyber analytics algorithms differentiate it in the market. Improvements are needed in algorithm enhancement, integration with EDRs and packages, and reporting emphasis.

What are the key features of Securonix UEBA?

Comprehensive Aggregation Library: Covers various use cases with ease.
Intuitive Dashboards: Organized for clear data visualization.
Advanced Algorithms: Detect insider threats accurately.
AI-Based Behavior Analytics: Full visibility into user activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Supports tailored monitoring and investigation.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Securonix UEBA?

Insider Threat Detection: Identify threats efficiently.
User Activity Monitoring: Continuous insights into user behavior.
Behavior Analysis: Differentiates normal from suspicious patterns.
Comprehensive Threat Notifications: Delivers timely alerts.

Organizations use Securonix UEBA in insider threat detection and behavior analysis, assisting in lateral movement, ransomware, and malware detection. It's used for network traffic observation in scenarios such as data exportation by contractors or abnormal account access, typically in appliance-based setups within data centers, offering thorough user threat notifications and behavior analysis tailored to industry needs.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

891,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.