One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #17. One Identity holds a 2.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 73 One Identity Safeguard reviews

7,550 Views
1,208 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

988 Views
860 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

17th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 2.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.2%
Securonix UEBA	2.8%
Other	95.0%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between."

"The best feature One Identity Safeguard offers is that it is a pretty new, modern tool that makes extensive use of its API."

"There is ease of implementation. Compared to other PAM solutions, it is easy to implement and use from an administrator's point of view."

"The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is perfect, scoring ten out of ten."

"It is generally easy-to-use and install."

"My advice to others is One Identity Safeguard is a must to have because it's part of the cybersecurity framework, such as Nest ISO."

"One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility."

"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"ROI is evident. The ROI is there from cost optimization and everything else."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA; it's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

Cons

"We have issues using Safeguard to record http/https connection in a video format. Currently, they don't have a mechanism to record this type of connection."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"Now, I think the best way to improve it will be to optimize the software, because the software begins to consume more resources (physical)."

"Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support."

"While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability."

"We should be able to create customized connectors in a better way. For ad hoc or special use cases, I sometimes find we have limitations. Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

I did not face any challenges with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, but for improved features, I need to address licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful. If One Identity improves integration durin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard in day-to-day work is to provide identity across all user accounts and domains, and it improves security across the enterprise by providing enhanced feat...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 16% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 13% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 11% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix UEBA delivers powerful user behavior analytics with intuitive dashboards and advanced threat detection algorithms.

Securonix UEBA aggregates diverse use case data into organized dashboards, visualizing trends and enabling cross-organization comparisons. Advanced algorithms detect insider threats and anomalies, ensuring comprehensive user activity visibility. Continuous enhancements through new policies and custom rules support thorough monitoring and investigation, while cyber analytics algorithms differentiate it in the market. Improvements are needed in algorithm enhancement, integration with EDRs and packages, and reporting emphasis.

What are the key features of Securonix UEBA?

Comprehensive Aggregation Library: Covers various use cases with ease.
Intuitive Dashboards: Organized for clear data visualization.
Advanced Algorithms: Detect insider threats accurately.
AI-Based Behavior Analytics: Full visibility into user activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Supports tailored monitoring and investigation.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Securonix UEBA?

Insider Threat Detection: Identify threats efficiently.
User Activity Monitoring: Continuous insights into user behavior.
Behavior Analysis: Differentiates normal from suspicious patterns.
Comprehensive Threat Notifications: Delivers timely alerts.

Organizations use Securonix UEBA in insider threat detection and behavior analysis, assisting in lateral movement, ransomware, and malware detection. It's used for network traffic observation in scenarios such as data exportation by contractors or abnormal account access, typically in appliance-based setups within data centers, offering thorough user threat notifications and behavior analysis tailored to industry needs.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

April 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.