One Identity Safeguard vs Securonix UEBA comparison

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #16. One Identity holds a 2.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 54 One Identity Safeguard reviews

5,477 Views
767 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

755 Views
649 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA compete in the cybersecurity space, with One Identity Safeguard leading in pricing and support satisfaction, while Securonix UEBA is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides robust features for access and privilege management, focusing on security, compliance, and operational efficiency for administrative tasks. Securonix UEBA offers advanced analytics for threat detection, utilizing machine learning to detect anomalous user behavior and provides expertise in behavioral analytics for threat prediction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, which is appealing to medium to large enterprises. Securonix UEBA, while having a more complex deployment process, offers extensive support resources. Its strong analytical capabilities can outweigh the initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is often chosen for its accessible pricing model and rapid time-to-value. Securonix UEBA might involve a higher initial setup cost but its advanced threat detection capabilities contribute to significant long-term savings by preventing costly security breaches. This makes Securonix UEBA attractive for organizations focusing on long-term security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,732 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

16th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 3.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	2.2%
Securonix UEBA	3.3%
Other	94.5%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Sindre Toft

Senior Information Technology Consultant at Helse Nord IKT

Centralized privileged access has improved control and now supports secure vendor billing oversight

The transparent mode is a seamless approach when using it. We have some issues with it, but we are working on it to make it work for us. Managing remote access for privileged users with the secure remote access feature is both easy and hard depending on the scenario we face. We have some systems that are easy and take not even a minute to set up, while others take a bit longer. We are in the middle of integrating One Identity Safeguard with the IGA solution, Identity Manager. We have some A2A setups, but it is not optimal. We are using RPA for developers, not actually RPA accounts, but that is something we are working on. We are also using the service account password rotation on the asset to some degree, and we are exploring options there. For integrating One Identity Safeguard, figuring out how password rotation works is a bit difficult because we have to make custom integrations. After that, it was no problem really. For the A2A use, it is not as easy as using something like HashiCorp's password management tools. It is mostly for certain features in One Identity Safeguard that I would like some improvements. Some of the things you can do in entitlements, there is a lot you can do there, but not everything is optimal. You have to have duplicates of a lot of things to make it work the way you want.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the Approval Anywhere, or cloud assistant feature and it is great. It enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time to the approval process."

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

"There is ease of implementation. Compared to other PAM solutions, it is easy to implement and use from an administrator's point of view."

"It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset."

"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

Cons

"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."

"It needs more marketing."

"From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."

"We have issues using Safeguard to connect to and record from the cloud. Currently, they don't have a mechanism to record this type of connection."

"One Identity Safeguard can be improved by fixing the documentation, which is very convoluted as of now, and addressing versioning, as some major bugs and issues are not documented well enough in the documentation, along with some patches and fixes."

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	20

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

We have a separate department that studies setup costs for each product, but as far as my information goes, the pricing and setup costs are very good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The most common improvement needed is for upgrades. One Identity Safeguard's desktop client should have a faster and easier upgrade process that ensures compatibility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard serves as our Privileged Access Management solution to enforce session management for administrators and allow them to access our systems in recorded sessions, which secures ...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 19% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Password Safe vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 21% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

March 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

February 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

March 2026

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.