Omnipliance [EOL] vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

BlueCat and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 75% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Omnipliance [EOL]

OpenText Diagnostics

Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews

700 Views
686 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Omnipliance [EOL]

OpenText Diagnostics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

OpenText Diagnostics and Omnipliance [EOL] compete in the network performance monitoring and diagnostics field. OpenText Diagnostics leads in support and pricing advantages, while Omnipliance [EOL] provides superior features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: OpenText Diagnostics delivers advanced network analytics, precise issue identification, and resolution. Omnipliance [EOL] provides comprehensive end-to-end monitoring, extensive data capture, and granular analysis, making it ideal for complex network environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Diagnostics offers an intuitive installation process and extensive support resources, facilitating integration into existing systems. Omnipliance [EOL] offers effective customer support but requires more technical expertise due to its sophisticated data capture capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Diagnostics offers competitive pricing with a good return on investment from lower setup costs. Omnipliance [EOL] involves a higher initial investment but delivers a substantial ROI through advanced features and comprehensive data capture, providing potential long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Omnipliance [EOL]

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Diagnostics

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (58th)

Featured Reviews

Use Omnipliance [EOL]?

Leave a review

Ravi Suvvari

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training

HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

New Relic vs Omnipliance [EOL]

Compared 35% of the time

Savision Live Maps vs Omnipliance [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

More Omnipliance [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 21% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 17% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download Omnipliance [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download OpenText Diagnostics product report

Also Known As

Savvius Omnipliance

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics

Overview

Omnipliance [EOL] is a robust solution designed for network performance monitoring and analysis. Its functionalities address comprehensive data capture and real-time monitoring for IT professionals seeking reliable insights.

Omnipliance [EOL] effectively meets the demands of businesses requiring detailed network assessments. It integrates advanced analytics to provide insights into network traffic and user activities, ensuring seamless operation. With a focus on enhancing network reliability, it allows IT specialists to promptly diagnose and resolve issues, reducing potential downtime.

What are the standout features of Omnipliance [EOL]?

High-speed Packet Capture: Captures and analyzes network packets in real time for immediate insights.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous network monitoring to swiftly detect anomalies.
Comprehensive Analytics: Provides deep dive analytics for informed network management.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to network size and demands without diminishing efficiency.
User-Centric Design: Intuitive design tailored for effective use by network experts.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Downtime: Increased network uptime through quick issue resolution.
Enhanced Security: Identifies threats and vulnerabilities promptly.
Improved Performance: Optimizes network traffic flow and utilizations.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes resource expenditure through streamlined operations.

Omnipliance [EOL] benefits telecommunications and financial sectors by providing tailored network solutions. Its adaptability caters to industry-specific requirements, offering strategic insights and operational efficiencies to meet business goals.

BlueCat

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Cisco Systems, Ekahau, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros

BSkyB, Alior Bank

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.